Presented to Senate Budget and Fiscal Review Subcommittee No. 4 on State Administration and General Government

Presented to Assembly Revenue and Taxation Committee

Presented to Assembly Revenue and Taxation, and Housing and Community Development Committees

Presented to: Assembly Committee on Jobs, Economic Development, and the Economy February 5, 2013.

Presented to the California Senate

Property taxes and charges are a major source of revenue for thousands of local governments in California, generating more than $55 billion in revenue in 2010-11. At the same time, many elements of California's property tax system are complex and not well understood. The purpose of this report is to serve as an introductory reference to this key funding source. In the report, we answer some common questions about the state's property taxes, such as: what taxes and charges are on the property tax bill, what properties make up California's tax base, which local local governments receive property tax revenue, and how does the property tax affect the state budget. We also identify some policy concerns related to how property tax revenue is distributed among local governments and evaluate the property tax system relative to common tax policy criteria.

Presented to Senate Governance and Finance Committee, Hon. Lois Wolk, Chair

Letter to Hon. Lois Wolk, Chair of Senate Governance and Finance Committee, providing an evaluation of the February 2012 report, "Economic and Production Impacts of the 2009 California Film and Television Tax Credit."

Presented to San Francisco Planning and Urban Research Association

Presented to Assembly Revenue and Taxation Committee, Hon. Henry T. Perea, Chair

We forecast that General Fund revenues and transfers in 2011-12 will be $3.7 billion below the level assumed in the June budget package. Such a shortfall could result in $2 billion of “trigger cuts” to various programs—including all of the “Tier 1” trigger cuts and three-fourths of the “Tier 2” cuts. (The Director of Finance will determine the actual amount of such cuts next month.) In 2011-12, we project that the state will have a $3 billion deficit, including the effects of these trigger cuts. In 2012-13, the state will face higher costs due to expiration of a number of temporary budget measures, an increase in Proposition 98 school costs under current law, the repayment of its Proposition 1A property tax loan, and other factors. We project a $10 billion operating shortfall (the difference between annual revenues and expenditures) in 2012-13. The $3 billion “carry-in” deficit from 2011-12 and the projected $10 billion operating shortfall mean that the Legislature and the Governor will need to address a $13 billion budget problem between now and the time that the state adopts a 2012-13 budget plan.

This letter is a statutorily-required analysis of the community development financial institution (CDFI) tax credit programs.

Presented to Assembly Revenue and Taxation Committee

Presented to Senate Governance and Finance Committee

Presented to Assembly Budget Subcommittee No. 4 on State Administration and Revenue and Taxation