What the New Federal Act Means to California

Transportation Equity Act
for the 21st Century

Figure 10


Figure 10
Tea 21
Urban and Fixed Guideway Formula Grant Programs

1998 Through 2004
(In Thousands)
Urbanized Areas Six-Year Maximum
Authorization
   
Urban Formula  
Antioch-Pittsburg $10,708
Bakersfield 22,198
Chico 4,676
Davis 5,676
Fairfield 6,893
Fresno 33,165
Hemet-San Jacinto 5,751
Hesperia-Apple Valley-Victorville 7,337
Indio-Coachella 3,478
Lanster-Palmdale 12,341
Lodi 4,831
Lompoc 2,967
Los Angeles, 1,210,716
Merced 5,275
Modesto 18,178
Napa 5,512
Oxnard-Ventura 44,808
Palm Springs 6,867
Redding 3,971
Riverside-San Bernardino 107,997
Sacramento 82,881
Salinas 10,449
San Diego 247,489
San Francisco-Oakland 699,532
San Jose 184,701
San Luis Obispo 4,948
Santa Cruz 8,358
Santa Maria 7,605
Santa Rosa 14,744
Santa Barbara 16,164
Seaside-Monterey 9,908
Simi Valley 9,379
Stockton 22,769
Vacaville 5,693
Visalia 6,503
Watsonville 3,583
Yuba City 5,717
Yuma CA / AZ 20
  • Urban Formula Subtotal
$2,863,788
Rural Formula $54,746
Elderly and Disabled Transportation $43,115
Fixed Guideway Modernization  
Los Angeles $165,485
Sacramento 19,029
San Diego 45,345
San Francisco 389,210
San Jose 71,817
  • Fixed Guideways Subtotal
$690,886
California Total $3,652,535
   

Continue to TEA 21 Figure 11


Return to Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century

Return to LAO Home Page