To browse all LAO publications, visit our Publications page.
June 19, 2015 - We have provided information on the major provisions of the budget plan passed by the Legislature on Friday, June 19. (It does not reflect potential gubernatorial vetoes.) We will provide a more comprehensive summary of the budget plan in our annual California Spending Plan later this summer.
June 2, 2015 - Presented to: Budget Conference Committee
June 2, 2015 - Presented to: Budget Conference Committee
May 20, 2015 - Presented to Senate Budget and Fiscal Review Subcommittee No. 1 on Education
May 18, 2015 - In this brief, we analyze the Governor’s higher education May Revision proposals. In the first section, we provide an overview of funding for higher education. In the next three sections, we describe and assess the Governor’s major proposals for the University of California (UC), the California State University (CSU), and the Awards for Innovation program, respectively. We discuss proposals for the California Community Colleges (CCC) in our companion Proposition 98 budget brief. The Appendix to the brief contains seven figures that have detailed higher education budget data.
May 18, 2015 - Presented to: Assembly Budget Subcommittee No. 2 on Education Finance
May 18, 2015 - Presented to: Assembly Budget Subcommittee No. 2 on Education Finance
May 13, 2015 - Presented to: Senate Committee on Business, Professions, and Economic Development and Senate Committee on Education
April 23, 2015 - Presented to Senate Budget and Fiscal Review Subcommittee No. 1 on Education
April 21, 2015 - Presented to Assembly Budget Subcommittee No. 2 on Education Finance
April 17, 2015 - Presented to: California Student Aid Commission
April 8, 2015 - Presented to: Assembly Budget Subcommittee No. 2 on Education Finance
March 25, 2015 - Chapter 620, Statutes of 2012 (AB 970, Fong), also known as the Working Families Student Fee Transparency and Accountability Act, requires the University of California (UC) and California State University (CSU) to fulfill three types of requirements related to systemwide tuition and fee increases. As detailed in this report, our review found UC was not in compliance with most provisions of Chapter 620. Though the legislation deems its provisions required for UC, UC believes it is not legally obligated to comply because of its constitutional autonomy. We found CSU complied with all Chapter 620 provisions.
March 24, 2015 - Presented to: Assembly Budget Subcommittee No. 2 on Education Finance
March 24, 2015 - Presented to: Assembly Budget Subcommittee No. 2 on Education Finance