Economic and demographic developments have important effects on California's budget outlook. For example, the strength of California's economy is an important determinant of the level of revenues collected from personal income taxes, sales and use taxes, and corporate income taxes. Similarly, both economic and demographic variables affect state government expenditure programs, including education, health and social services, and youth and adult corrections.
In recent years, California's economic expansion has provided sufficient resources to enable the Governor and Legislature to simultaneously balance the budget, increase budgetary reserves, reduce taxes, and raise expenditures for education and a variety of other state programs. The Governor's budget for 2000-01 assumes that healthy economic growth will continue, albeit at a more moderate pace than in the past several years.
In this part, we review recent economic developments in the nation and state, discuss the Governor's economic forecast, and present our own perspective on California's economic outlook. We also discuss current demographic developments and highlight our population projections through 2002.
Once again, the U.S. economy outpaced projections in 1999. Driven by high levels of consumer confidence, strong income growth, and increased wealth, real gross domestic product (GDP) expanded by around 4 percent for the fourth year in a row. The increase was unprecedented for an economy in its ninth year of expansion and operating at near full employment.
Most Sectors Were Strong. As indicated in Figure 1, the majority of the dollar increase in real GDP between 1998 and 1999 was attributable to consumer expenditures. Real consumer spending grew by 5.2 percent, led by particularly rapid increases in purchases of autos and other durable goods. Business fixed investment was the second largest contributor to GDP growth last year, reflecting booming business expenditures on computers and software, and continued increases in nonresidential construction activity. The only "soft spot" in the economy was foreign trade, where strong US demand for imported goods caused the US merchandise trade deficit to increase sharply during the year.
Yet Inflation Remained Tame. Inflation remained low nationally in 1999, despite some increases in energy and related commodity prices. The US Consumer Price Index (CPI) rose just 2.1 percent during the year, while the US GDP price deflator (which reflects the costs of all goods and services produced in the economy) was up just 1.3 percent.
Although inflation has continued to remain low, the Federal Reserve (FED) has expressed concerns that persistently strong spending growth, coupled with extremely tight labor markets, will eventually lead to price increases. In an attempt to slow growth and ease inflationary pressures, the FED raised interest rates three times last year, and additional increases are expected in 2000. In response to these factors, long-term interest rates rose during 1999--from 5.5 percent at the beginning of the year to over 6.5 percent by December--and have continued to edge up during early 2000.
Late last year, the US Bureau of Economic Analysis released major historical revisions to the nation's gross domestic product accounts. These revisions indicate that the economy has been growing faster than previously thought, largely due to higher estimates of worker productivity gains. For example, based on the new estimates, productivity gains since 1995 have averaged about 2.7 percent annually, compared to the previous estimate of about 2 percent.
The higher productivity estimate is very significant from an economics standpoint. Specifically, it provides evidence that the vast amounts of business investment in computer and information technologies over the past decade have indeed paid dividends, by raising the level of output-per-worker in a variety of industries. The higher productivity figures have caused many economists to reassess long-held assumptions about how fast the US economy can grow on a sustained basis. Prior estimates of the economy's long-term GDP "speed limit" were in the range of 2 percent to 2.5 percent per year. In contrast, the recently experienced added productivity growth, if sustained, implies a noninflationary growth potential of more than 3 percent annually--a very significant upward reassessment. As discussed below, this positive development is reflected in our economic forecasts for the nation and California.
California enjoyed the strongest year of the current expansion in 1999. Although comprehensive GDP data are not available at the state level, evidence of California's strength is widespread (see Figure 2, next page).
It includes healthy employment growth, major increases in income tax withholding receipts (which are a reflection of large wage gains), strong gains in taxable sales, and record levels of home sales.
|Recent Evidence of California's Economic Strength|
Personal income tax
|Up by 17 percent during the fourth quarter of 1999 compared to the prior year, signifying major gains in wages and stock-option income.|
|Employment||Grew by 3.4 percent in 1999, reflecting widespread gains. Unemployment was at the lowest level since 1970.|
|Taxable sales||Up nearly 9 percent in 1999--by far the strongest increase in the current expansion period.|
|New vehicle registrations||Up nearly 10 percent, reflecting major increases in sales of cars, sport utility vehicles, and light trucks.|
|Nonresidential construction||Surged to an over-$20 billion annual rate in November, one of the highest levels on record.|
|Home sales and prices||Home sales topped 675,000 units, an all-time record. Prices rose throughout the state.|
As with the nation, California's economy was boosted by the "wealth effect" associated with the rising stock market. In addition to the general increase in the market, large gains in equity values specific to California's high-tech firms further boosted the wealth of Californians by increasing the values of stock options granted by high-tech firms to their employees. It appears that California's taxpayers "cashed out" a portion of their accumulated capital gains in 1999 to purchase autos, homes, and other "big-ticket" items. This was likely a major factor behind the nearly 9 percent increase in taxable sales that occurred last year.
Overall, we estimate that California personal income increased by 7 percent in 1999--the largest gain of the current economic expansion. Wage and salary employment increased by about 3.4 percent, reflecting particularly large gains in the services and construction industries. The unemployment rate fell from 5.9 percent in December 1998 to 4.9 percent in December 1999, the lowest level in three decades.
A year ago, one of the few negative elements in California's economic picture involved exports to foreign countries. Asia's economic problems were resulting in substantial declines in California's exports to the region, and consequently were depressing sales and employment in California's high-tech manufacturing industries (which are major exporters to the area).
As 1999 unfolded, many Asian economies started to rebound, boosting foreign demand for California goods. Reflecting these improved conditions, California exports increased over 10 percent in the third quarter of 1999 compared to a year earlier, as shipments soared to such countries as South Korea, Taiwan, and China. Exports to Japan continued to fall, reflecting near-stagnant economic growth in that country. However,
exports fell at a much-diminished rate compared to 1998.
The recovery in exports to Asia bodes well for California's producers of computers and electronics, which are the leading exporters to that region. Employment in these industries stabilized in the second half of 1999, and appears set to expand in 2000.
Two problem areas in an otherwise bright economic picture for California during 1999 were a resumption of job losses in the state's
aerospace industry, and a significant increase in inflation.
Despite these problems, 1999's overall economic performance in California was the best in well over a decade, and the state's economy
entered 2000 with considerable upward momentum.
The Governor's budget forecast assumes that economic growth will continue at a healthy, though moderating, pace through 2001. As shown in Figure 3, real US GDP is forecast to slow significantly--from 3.9 percent in 1999 to 3.1 percent in 2000 and 2.8 percent in 2001. The administration forecasts that inflation will rise modestly in 2000 due to increases in employee compensation costs and commodity prices, before easing in 2001 in response to slower national growth.
|Summary of the Budget's Economic Outlook|
|United States Forecast|
|Percent change in:|
|Wage and salary jobs||2.2||1.8||1.6|
|Consumer Price Index||2.2||2.9||2.5|
|Unemployment rate (%)||4.2||4.0||4.0|
|Housing starts (000)||1,670||1,560||1,550|
|Percent change in:|
|Wage and salary jobs||3.3||2.9||2.5|
|Consumer Price Index||3.0||3.5||3.3|
|Unemployment rate (%)||5.3||4.8||4.7|
|New housing permits (000)||140||154||167|
As regards California, the budget forecast assumes that the state will continue to outperform the nation during the next two years. Personal income growth is forecast to slow only marginally--from 6.6 percent in 1999 to 6.5 percent in 2000--before further slowing to 5.7 percent in 2001. The budget forecasts similarly healthy but moderating increases for employment, led by computer-related services and the construction industry.
Finally, the budget anticipates that rising home ownership and rental costs will continue to put upward pressure on inflation in California. It forecasts that the California CPI will increase 3.5 percent in 2000 and by 3.2 percent in 2001.
Reflecting continued positive developments in both the US and California economies, we estimate that 1999 ended on a stronger note than is reflected by the administration, and similarly that economic growth will continue at a significantly stronger pace through 2000. Our national and state economic forecasts through 2002 are summarized in Figure 4.
|Summary of the Lao's Economic Outlook|
|United States Forecast|
|Percent change in:|
|Wage and salary jobs||2.2||1.8||1.5||1.1|
|Consumer Price Index||2.1||2.5||2.6||2.5|
|Unemployment rate (%)||4.2||4.0||4.2||4.4|
|Housing starts (000)||1,668||1,575||1,520||1,500|
|Percent change in:|
|Wage and salary jobs||3.4||3.0||2.5||2.2|
|Consumer Price Index||2.9||3.1||2.9||2.9|
|Unemployment rate (%)||5.2||4.7||4.5||4.6|
|New housing permits (000)||139||154||164||170|
Following its 4 percent increase in 1999, we forecast that US real GDP will increase at a more moderate 3.6 percent in 2000, 3.1 percent in 2001, and 2.9 percent in 2002. The recent increase experienced in interest rates is expected to have some dampening effects on consumer and business spending, but their growth will nevertheless continue at a healthy pace. The same forces that boosted growth in 1999 will be present this year, and likely in 2001 and 2002 as well. Consumer spending will continue to grow, reflecting high levels of wealth, consumer confidence, and incomes. Investment spending is also projected to be strong, reflecting continued strong business spending on computers, information systems, and software. Also contributing to growth during the next two-to-three years is an improving outlook for exports, due to the strengthening of economic conditions in Asia and other foreign markets.
Despite continued robust economic growth, however, we expect inflation to remain moderate. The US CPI is forecast to rise 2.5 percent in 2000 and 2.6 percent in 2001, compared to 2.1 percent in 1999. A key
positive factor in the inflation outlook continues to be large anticipated productivity gains, which enable businesses to increase wages without raising the prices of their products and services.
We forecast that California is set for another year of strong growth in 2000, before its economy slows to a more moderate, but still healthy pace in 2001 and 2002. As shown in Figure 5, we expect California's economy to outperform the nation by a significant margin over the next two years.
Figure 6 indicates that there are both strengths and concerns inherent in our upbeat forecast for California.
California's current positive economic outlook reflects a variety of both external factors (such as strong US and worldwide demand) and internal forces (such as high confidence levels, rapid growth in business startups, and rising incomes). As shown in Figure 6, two particularly important factors are (1) the large and growing presence of dynamic high-tech industries in this state, and (2) the resulting increases in wealth and income accruing to many of California's households and businesses.
The High-Tech Sector. California has a large and growing presence of computer, telecommunications, electronics, software, and Internet-related firms, all of which are major beneficiaries of the continued strong national investment in new technologies. The state's high-tech manufacturing industries will receive an added boost from the recovery in foreign demand for computers, electronics, and related goods. While the San Francisco Bay Area has been California's high-tech center in the past, growth is spreading to Los Angeles and other regions of the state.
|Key Strengths and Concerns In California's Economic Outlook|
|Positive outlook for high-tech industries, reflecting:|
|High levels of wealth and consumer confidence|
|Possible major retrenchment or correction in the stock market|
|Potential housing shortages|
The Wealth and Income Effects. As indicated above, California is the home of a large share of high-tech companies which have experienced dramatic appreciation in stock values in recent years. Absent a substantial drop in stock valuations, the tremendous amount of capital gains already "stored up" in stock options held by the employees, management, and owners of these firms will likely have significant positive impacts on wealth and confidence in California's economy for a number of years to come.
The past dramatic increases in stock market values, particularly in the high-tech area, are both a reflection of past strong business activity and, as indicated above, a positive force in the future economic outlook. However, the added importance of the stock market also carries risk. For example, if the market were to suffer a steep and sustained retrenchment, significant slowdowns in consumer spending and perhaps reduced levels of new business expansions, could be experienced.
A second source of concern and uncertainty, particularly for the longer term, is whether home construction will "keep up" with new demands brought about by economic growth and population increases. Home construction in 1999 was 139,000 units, which is well below the 170,000 to 180,000 annual level that many analysts believe is necessary to accommodate demand. In many areas where economic growth has been strongest--particularly Silicon Valley--there is limited land capacity for new construction. Likewise, in many other areas of the state, new housing development has become a contentious issue, due to concerns about the environmental and societal impacts of additional growth. At some point, shortfalls in new home construction could limit economic expansion in California.
As indicated in Figure 7, over the three-year period 2000 through 2002, California wage and salary jobs are projected to increase at an average annual rate of nearly 2.6 percent. In numeric terms, over one-half of the new jobs are expected to be in the state's large and diverse service sector, reflecting gains in business services, hotels, automotive repair, health services, and entertainment. In percentage terms, the fastest-growing sector will continue to be construction, where employment is expected to grow by about 4.3 percent, reflecting continued gains in both residential and nonresidential building activity in the state.
More moderate job increases are forecast for a variety of other sectors and industries, including trade, manufacturing, finance, insurance, real estate, and government. In the context of the current outlook, these moderate projected growth rates are not a sign of weakness, but rather reflect tight labor market conditions, and the continued utilization of labor-saving technologies by businesses.
As indicated above, the bulk of new jobs created over the next three years is likely to be in the state's large and diverse services sector. We expect job gains throughout this sector. However, the single fastest growing individual industry is likely to be business services, which now includes over 1.2 million employees (almost 8 percent of all California jobs) and has been growing consistently in recent years by more than 8 percent annually.
In past years, business services primarily consisted of such low-wage industries as temporary employment agencies, security services, and building maintenance services. However, in the current expansion, a rapidly growing component has been computer-related services, which includes companies involved in the Internet and related software design, as well as computer systems design.
Jobs in computer-related business services have been increasing at a dramatic pace. We estimate that growth over the past year has exceeded 15 percent, and that total jobs in these industries amount to more than 300,000. The computer services industry is now about twice the size of the state's aerospace industry. As indicated in Figure 8, wages in key sub-sectors within the computer services industry averaged between $80,000 and $100,000 last year, well over twice the economy-wide average. We expect that employment in computer-related services will continue to expand by more 10 percent annually in both 2000 and 2001, making it one of the fastest growing employment categories in the state.
Both residential and nonresidential construction activity were hit hard by the early-1990s' recession. The number of permits for residential units fell by nearly two-thirds and the value of nonresidential permits declined by over 50 percent between the late 1980s and early-to-mid-1990s. In the second half the decade, however, the performance of the two sectors varied significantly.
Residential Construction Has Lagged. On the one hand, the recovery in the residential construction sector has been tepid by historical standards. Housing permits totaled 139,000 units last year, and we expect the annual number to further increase to 170,000 by 2002. However, even if our forecast is realized, home construction will still be well below the over 220,000 average for the 1980s.
Nonresidential Construction Has Soared. In contrast, nonresidential construction has seen booming performance in recent years, and is now nearing the levels achieved in the mid-1980s (see Figure 9). Over the past five years, for example, the annual value of new industrial buildings has
quadrupled while the annual value of commercial buildings has more than doubled. This growth was concentrated in the San Francisco Bay Area during the earlier stages of the recovery, but more recently has spread to Southern California and the Central Valley as well. We expect that the projected ongoing business expansion will result in even further gains in nonresidential construction activity. As shown in Figure 9, we expect that total valuations will surpass the 1980s' peak by the end of our forecast period.
Figure 10 compares our forecasts for the nation and California to those we made in November 1999 (see California's Fiscal Outlook), as well as those of the University of California, Los Angeles (December 1999), the consensus forecast published in Blue Chip Economic Indicators (January 2000), Western Blue Chip Economic Forecast (February 2000), and the Governor's budget forecast. Our current forecast for California is generally more optimistic than each of the other projections shown, particularly with regard to personal income.
Key factors behind our more optimistic outlook include (1) the upward revisions to historical GDP and productivity estimates and (2) recent data showing strong withholding, employment, and sales, which suggest that California is entering 2000 with more momentum than previously thought.
As discussed in "Part Three," the combination of our more optimistic near-term economic outlook and recent strong revenue receipts is responsible for our more optimistic revenue forecast compared to both our
November report and the Governor's budget forecast.
California's demographic trends both directly and indirectly affect the state's economy, revenue collections, and expenditure levels. For example, they influence the size of the labor force, the demand for autos and homes, the volume of taxable sales, and the amount of income taxes paid. Similarly, the population and its age distribution affect school enrollments and public programs in many other areas, such as health care and social services. Given this, the state's demographic outlook is a key element in assessing and projecting the state's budgetary situation.
Figure 11 (see page 32) summarizes the LAO's updated demographic forecast. We predict that California's total population will rise from an estimated 34.6 million in 2000, to 35.2 million in 2001 and 35.8 million in 2002. This translates into an annual growth rate of somewhat over 1.6 percentless than the boom years of the late 1980s but still well above the nation's 0.9 percent.
|Recent Economic Forecast Comparisonsa|
|United States Real GDP:|
|Blue Chip "Consensus"b January||3.9||3.6||3.0|
|California Wage and Salary Jobs:|
|Western Blue Chip "Consensus"c Febuary||2.9||2.7||2.4|
|California Personal Income:|
|Western Blue Chip "Consensus"c Febuary||6.7||6.2||5.8|
|California Taxable Sales:|
|Western Blue Chip "Consensus"c Febuary||7.0||5.9||5.4|
|a Acronyms used apply to Legislative Analyst's Office (LAO); University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA); and Department of Finance (DOF).|
|b Average forecast of about 50 national firms surveyed in January by Blue Chip Economic Indicators.|
|c Average forecast of organizations surveyed in February by Western Blue Chip Economic Forecasts.|
The number of new Californians being added each year--upwards of 600,000--is well-above the size of such cities as Long Beach, Oakland, and Fresno; and similar to a state like Vermont. About half of this yearly growth is attributable to net in-migration from other nations and states, while the remainder is due to "natural" increase (that is, births minus deaths). Regarding the net in-migration component, the foreign share is by far the most significantwell over 200,000 annually.
|Summary of the LAO's |
California Demographic Forecast
|2000 Through 2002 |
(Populations in Thousands)
|Total population (July 1 basis)||34,629||35,198||35,765|
|Changes in population|
|Natural change (birth minus deaths)||281||280||282|
|Net in-migration (in-flows minus out-flows)||282||289||285|
The implications of demographic trends for the budget depend not only on the total number of Californians, but also on their characteristics. California is well-known for having one of the world's most dynamic and diverse populations in the world, including an increasingly rich ethnic mix; a large number of in-migrants; and a wide geographic dispersion encompassing both highly urban, suburban, and rural lifestyles. The state's current age and ethnic mix is shown in Figure 12.
Regarding ethnicity, we project a continuing trend toward increased diversity, as the white share drifts down and that for Hispanics and a variety of other ethnic groups drifts up. The age-related characteristics of California's population growth are especially important from a budgetary perspective, given their implications for such program areas as education, health care, and social services. Figure 13 shows our forecasts for both the percentage and numeric changes in different population age groups. It indicates that by far the greatest growth is expected for the
45 to 64 age group (the so-called "baby boomers"). It also shows that the under 5 age group is expected to decline over the period, presaging a further slowdown in K-12 enrollment growth in coming years.
California's continued strong population growthincluding its age, ethnic, and migratory characteristicscan be expected to have many implications for the state's economy and public services in the budget year and beyond. For instance: