Legislative Analyst's Office

Analysis of the 2001-02 Budget Bill


Higher Education Introduction

The Governor's budget proposes a $783 million increase in General Fund expenditures for higher education in 2001-02. This is an increase of 8.7 percent above estimated expenditures in the current year. This funds 5 percent base increases for the University of California (UC) and the California State University (CSU) and a 3.9 percent inflation adjustment for the California Community Colleges (CCC). It also funds enrollment growth of 3.3 percent for UC and 3 percent for CSU and CCC. Additionally, the budget provides General Fund support to hold resident student fees constant, and it funds several Governor's initiatives, including increasing state support for summer terms at UC and CSU and increasing part-time faculty salaries at CCC.

Total Higher Education Budget Proposal. As Figure 1 shows, the 2001-02 budget proposal provides a total of $28.1 billion from all sources for higher education. This amount is $1.4 billion, or 5.4 percent, more than estimated expenditures in the current year. The total consists of funding for all activities of the University of California (UC)—including activities that are only marginally related to instruction, such as providing medical care at its hospitals ($2.6 billion) and managing three major U.S. Department of Energy laboratories ($3.2 billion)—as well as all activities of the California State University (CSU), the California Community Colleges (CCC), Hastings College of the Law, the California Student Aid Commission, and the California Postsecondary Education Commission.

Figure 1

Higher Education Budget Summarya

(Dollars in Millions)

 

Change

 

Estimated
2000-01

Proposed
2001-02

Amount

Percent

University of California

General Fund

$3,205.5

$3,408.0

$202.5

6.3%

Student fee revenue

879.2

916.7

37.4

4.3

Federal and other funds

10,914.1

11,302.3

388.2

3.6

Totals

$14,998.9

$15,626.9

$628.1

4.2%

California State University

General Fund

$2,464.8

$2,680.8

$215.9

8.8%

Student fee revenue

614.0

637.6

23.5

3.8

Federal and other funds

1,788.9

1,768.0

(20.9)

-1.2

Totals

$4,867.8

$5,086.3

$218.6

4.5%

California Community Colleges

General Fund

$2,734.9

$2,960.1

$225.2

8.2%

Local property tax revenue

1,709.4

1,846.6

137.2

8.0

Student fee revenue

162.1

167.8

5.7

3.5

Federal and other funds

1,110.7

1,186.4

75.7

6.8

Totals

$5,717.1

$6,160.8

$443.8

7.8%

Student Aid Commission

General Fund

$531.7

$669.5

$137.8

25.9%

Federal and other funds

519.3

519.3

0.0

0.0

Totals

$1,051.0

$1,188.9

$137.8

13.1%

Other b

General Fund

$18.3

$19.6

$1.3

7.0%

Student fee revenue

13.1

13.3

0.2

1.4

Federal and other funds

15.4

13.6

-1.8

-11.9

Totals

$46.8

$46.4

-$0.4

-0.8%

Grand totals

$26,681.6

$28,109.4

$1,427.9

5.4%

General Fund

$8,955.3

$9,737.9

$782.7

8.7%

Property tax revenue

1,709.4

1,846.6

137.2

8.0

Student fee revenue

1,668.4

1,735.4

66.9

4.0

Federal and other funds

14,348.5

14,789.5

4,441.1

3.1

a General Fund amounts exclude capital outlay and payments on general obligation bonds—both of which we discuss later in the Capital Outlay Section.

b Includes Hastings College of the Law and the California Postsecondary Education Commission.

Major Funding Sources. The 2001-02 budget proposes General Fund expenditures of $9.7 billion for higher education. This amount is $783 million, or 8.7 percent, more than estimated expenditures in the current year. The budget also projects that local property taxes will contribute $1.8 billion for CCC in 2001-02, an increase of $137 million, or 8 percent, over the current year. In addition, student fee and tuition revenue at all the higher education segments account for $1.7 billion of proposed expenditures. This amount is $67 million, or 4 percent, greater than student fee revenue in the current year. (This increase results primarily from proposed enrollment growth rather than higher fees.) Lastly, the budget includes $15 billion in other funds—including federal funds, restricted funds, and funds from private sources. The numbers in Figure 1 do not include capital outlay expenditures or the General Fund costs associated with paying off general obligation bonds. These costs are discussed in the Capital Outlay section.

General Fund and Proposition 98 Proposals by Segment. The budget proposes General Fund expenditures for UC of $3.4 billion, which is $202 million, or 6.3 percent, more than estimated General Fund expenditures in the current year. For CSU, the budget proposes General Fund expenditures of $2.7 billion, an increase of $216 million, or 8.8 percent, over the current year. For CCC, the budget proposes General Fund expenditures of $3 billion, which is $225 million, or 8.2 percent, more than the current year. Incorporating local property tax revenue, the budget provides CCC with $4.7 billion in Proposition 98 funding, an increase of $360 million, or 8.3 percent, over the current year.

Major Budget Changes

The Governor's budget proposal provides all three segments of higher education with funding for base budget increases, enrollment growth, and various new and expanded programs.

Compensation, Core Needs, and Cost-of-living Increases. Figure 2 describes the major General Fund budget changes proposed by the Governor for UC, CSU, and CCC. The largest changes in UC's and CSU's budgets are 5 percent increases in their General Fund bases—4 percent of which is designated for compensation and other cost increases and 1 percent which is designated for "core" needs such as deferred maintenance, instructional equipment, and library materials. The budget provides $150 million to UC and $117 million to CSU for these base increases. For CCC, the budget contains $154 million for a 3.9 percent adjustment for inflation.

Figure 2

Higher Education
Proposed Major General Fund Changes

University of California

Requested:

$3.4 billion

 

Increase:

$202 million

(+6.3%)

Base Budget Increase: $119.7 million (4 percent) for salary and other cost increases, and $29.9 million (1 percent) for deferred maintenance, library acquisitions, and technology.

Enrollment Growth: $52.2 million (3.3 percent: 5,700 full-time-equivalent (FTE) students.

Fee Increase Buyout: $21.5 million (in lieu of 4.9 percent increase).

Enhanced Summer Instruction: $20.7 million for Berkeley, Los Angeles, and Santa Barbara campuses.

California State University

Requested:

$2.7 billion

 

Increase:

$216 million

(+8.8%)

Base Budget Increase: $93.5 million (4 percent) for salary and other cost increases, and $23.4 million (1 percent) for deferred maintenance, library acquisitions, and technology.

Enrollment Growth: $55.7 million (3 percent: 8,760 FTE students).

Fee Increase Buyout: $16.6 million (in lieu of 4.9 percent increase).

Enhanced Summer Instruction: $12.4 million for Fullerton, Long Beach, San Diego, and San Francisco campuses.

California Community Colleges

Requested:

$3 billion

 

Increase:

$225 million

(+8.2%)

Base Budget Increase: $153.8 million (3.9 percent).

Enrollment Growth: $106.8 million (3 percent: 30,871 FTE students).

Increase Part-Time Faculty Salaries: $62 million.

Financial Aid Outreach: $11.4 million.

Enrollment Growth. As Figure 3 shows, the budget proposes total higher education full-time equivalent (FTE) student enrollments of 1.5 million, or 3 percent, over the budgeted enrollments for the current year. The budget provides funding for 5,700 additional FTE enrollments, at UC and 8,760 additional FTE enrollments at CSU. The Governor proposes $9,158 and $6,360, respectively, in General Fund support for each additional FTE student at UC and CSU. Thus, the total cost of accommodating proposed enrollment growth at UC is $52.2 million and the total cost at CSU is $55.7 million. The budget includes $106.8 million for CCC to accommodate a 3 percent, or 30,871 FTE, increase in enrollment. This is equivalent to $3,461 in Proposition 98 support for every additional CCC FTE student.

Figure 3

Higher Education Enrollment

1999-00 Through 2001-02
Full-Time Equivalent (FTE) Students

 

Change From 2000-01

 

Actual 1999-00

Budgeted
2000-01

Proposed
2001-02

Amount

Percent

University of California a

Undergraduate

132,127

135,760

140,930

5,170

3.8%

Postbaccalaureate

653

775

900

125

16.1

Graduate

27,084

28,307

28,712

405

1.4

Health Sciences

12,578

12,266

12,266

UC totals

172,442

177,108

182,808

5,700

3.2%

California State University a

Undergraduate

245,714

254,354

261,777

7,423

2.9%

Postbaccalaureate

20,947

21,683

22,315

632

2.9

Graduate

23,172

23,987

24,687

700

2.9

Calstate Teach

182

189

194

5

2.6

CSU totals

290,014

300,212

308,972

8,760

2.9%

California Community Colleges

994,230

1,029,028

1,059,899

30,871

3.0%

Hastings College of the Law

1,116

1,185

1,200

15

1.3%

Grand totals

1,457,802

1,507,533

1,552,879

45,346

3.0%

a These numbers include all self-support FTE students enrolled in summer 1999 (rather than including only the summer enrollment that the 2001-02 Governor's Budget proposes "buying out"). In summer 1999, 6,542 FTE students and 8,232 FTE students, respectively, enrolled in UC's and CSU's self-supported summer session.

Governor's Initiatives. The budget includes funds for various new and expanded programs. Most notably, the Governor's budget provides $128 million for 57,000, or 37 percent, more Cal Grant awards. This significant increase is a result of prior-year expansions and new legislation making the Cal Grant program an entitlement for qualified students. For UC, the budget extends several one-time appropriations—including $18 million for expansion of Internet 2 and $20 million to reduce further its maintenance backlog and to purchase instructional equipment and library materials. The budget provides CSU with $20 million in one-time funds for similar purposes. It also provides CSU with $18.5 million to expand the Educational Technology Institutes and $17.5 million to expand the Governor's Teaching Fellowship program—both of which were established in the current year. The budget provides both UC and CSU funding to enhance the quality of their summer terms ($20.7 million and $12.4 million, respectively). Lastly, for CCC, the Governor's budget proposes $62 million to improve part-time faculty salaries.

Student Fees

Resident Student Fees Held Constant. Figure 4 shows student fee levels at California's public colleges and universities. Last year was the sixth consecutive year the state either reduced fees or held them constant. In the budget year, the Governor proposes once again to hold resident student fees constant at all the segments. For 2001-02, undergraduate systemwide and campus-based fees would remain $3,964 at UC, $1,834 at CSU, and $330 at CCC. The budget includes $22 million to compensate UC and $17 million to compensate CSU for additional revenue they would otherwise collect if they raised fees by 4.9 percent, which the budget assumes would reflect the increase in California per-capita personal income.

Figure 4

Higher Education 2001-02
Proposed Annual Student Fees

 

Residents

Nonresidents

 

Educational Fee

Total
Fee a

Tuition

Total
Fee a

University of California

Undergraduates

$2,716

$3,964

$10,704

$15,038

Graduates

2,896

4,747

10,704

15,641

Professionals b

Lowest fee

4,696

6,547

15,400

17,441

Highest fee

9,272

11,123

19,976

22,017

California State University

Undergraduates

$1,428

$1,834

$7,380

$9,214

Graduates

1,506

1,912

7,380

9,292

California Community Colleges

$330

$330c

$3,900d

$3,900c

Hastings College of the Law

$10,175

$11,232

$9,486

$20,718

a Total fee includes educational fees, registration fees, and campus-based fees (weighted average for UC and unweighted average for CSU).

b Represents range of total fees charged to professional-school students.

c Some community colleges charge additional fees (for purposes such as instructional supplies, health care, and parking). The amount of these fees varies considerably across campuses.

d The amount per unit for nonresident fees at CCC ranges from $114 to $155. The statewide average is $134 per semester unit.

At UC, the Governor's budget proposes to increase fees charged to nonresident students by $460, or approximately 3 percent. The budget does not increase nonresident student fees at CSU.

Two Perspectives on Student Fees. The top portion of Figure 5 shows that student fee revenue comprises only a small portion of all state and local support provided to the three segments. For example, at the community colleges, total student fee revenue comprises less than 5 percent of all state and local support, and almost 40 percent of students do not pay any fees. The bottom portion of Figure 5 compares student fees at the three segments with their comparison institutions. Total student fees at all three segments are substantially lower than fee levels at their comparison institutions. The average current resident student fee at UC's four public comparison institutions is $5,243, which is almost one-third greater than the total proposed resident student fee at UC. At CSU's 15 public comparison institutions, the average student fee is more than double CSU's proposed 2001-02 fee level. Finally, the CCC does not have a special comparison group, but its proposed fee level is the nation's lowest. Students attending CCC in 2001-02 would pay only one-fifth of the 1999-00 national average for public two-year institutions.


Return to Education Table of Contents, 2001-02 Budget Analysis