November 25, 2003

Dear Attorney General Lockyer:

Pursuant to Election Code Section 9005, we have reviewed the proposed measure entitled “Equal Opportunity in Education Initiative” (File No. SA2003RF0046).

Proposal

If enacted by the voters, this constitutional measure creates a system of K-12 Free Choice Schools similar to private schools, but state funded. Specifically, the measure has the following major provisions:

Fiscal Effect

This measure would have major fiscal impacts on the state and local school districts. The size of these fiscal impacts would depend on legal interpretations of the proposition and such factors as:

Impact on Proposition 98 Minimum Guarantee

Proposition 98, approved by the voters in 1988, establishes a minimum funding level for public schools and community colleges (K-14 education). Proposition 98 permits the state to spend more, or under specified circumstances less, than this minimum guarantee. The current estimated minimum funding level for K-14 education is over $45 billion. This minimum funding level increases each year generally with changes in public school attendance and growth in the state’s economy. (K-14 education also receives additional funds from sources that are “outside” of Proposition 98, such as federal funds and lottery funds.)

This measure would affect Proposition 98 funding in two main ways:

Private School Conversions. This measure would result in an increase in the minimum guarantee as private schools converted to Free Choice Schools (public schools). Currently, over 600,000 students attend private schools. As private schools convert to Free Choice Schools, attendance in public schools would increase, resulting in a higher Proposition 98 minimum guarantee. If even half of existing private school students moved to Free Choice Schools over time, this would increase state Proposition 98 costs by billions of dollars annually.

Public School Conversions. Many existing public schools would have a fiscal incentive to convert some or all of their schools to Free Choice Schools. Currently, school districts’ funding per pupil varies widely due to a number of facts. For example, elementary school districts receive less general purpose funding per pupil than do unified or high school districts. In addition, a portion of state funding for school districts is provided through state categorical programs providing additional resources, for example, to districts with high numbers of socio-economically disadvantaged pupils, low-performing students or English language learners. Under this measure, any public school district receiving below-average funding would have an incentive to convert to a Free Choice School to increase their funding per pupil. Unless funding were taken away from schools with above average funding per pupil, the state would be required to provide additional funding as low funded schools converted. Over time, these costs also could be in the billions of dollars annually.

Summary of Fiscal Effects. This measure would have the following major fiscal impact:

 


Return to Initiatives and Propositions

Return to Legislative Analyst's Office Home Page