October 2, 2007
Pursuant to Elections Code Section 9005, we have
reviewed the proposed statutory initiative related to presidential
electors (A.G. File No. 07‑0052).
Major Provisions
Under the Electoral College system
to select the U.S. President, each state is assigned a certain number of
electors who determine the state’s presidential choice. California
currently receives 55 electors.
Current Law. Under existing law,
each political party selects its slate of presidential electors in
accordance with procedures that differ by party. The electors of the
political party who receive the highest number of votes statewide are
certified as the state's presidential electors. Existing law also
provides that electors be given $10 as compensation for their services
and be reimbursed for mileage incurred from traveling between their home
and the State Capitol at a rate of $0.05 per mile.
Proposed Law. This measure alters
existing procedures for selection of presidential electors in certain
situations. Under the measure, political parties would nominate an
elector in each congressional district and two electors on a statewide
basis. If a majority of other states have adopted some form of
proportional voting for the presidential election, the elector of the
political party which received the highest number of votes in each
California congressional district would be certified as the state's
presidential elector of that district. Similarly, the two electors of
the political party which received the plurality of statewide votes
would be certified as the statewide electors. If, however, a majority of
other states have not adopted some form of proportional voting, then the
current system of certifying all electors from the political party
receiving the highest number of statewide votes would continue. This
measure also eliminates the authorization for compensation to electors
or reimbursement of their travel expenses.
Fiscal Effect
This measure would require the Secretary of State
to survey the process by which presidential electoral votes are
allocated in other states every four years. The measure would also
eliminate state costs for compensation to electors and reimbursement of
their travel expenses every four years. The net fiscal effect would not
be significant.
Summary. This measure would have
the following fiscal effect:
·
No significant net fiscal effect.
Return to Initiatives and Propositions
Return to Legislative Analyst's Office Home Page