July 18, 2008
n s Pursuant to Elections Code Section 9005, we have reviewed the
proposed constitutional measure related to term limits (A.G. File No.
08‑0014).
Background
The state’s voters passed Proposition 140 at the
November 1990 election. As well as other changes, Proposition 140
changed the State Constitution to create term limits for elected Members
of the state Assembly and Senate. Term limits restrict the number of
years that individuals can serve in the Legislature. Currently, an
individual generally cannot serve a total of more than 14 years in the
Legislature. (An exception is when an individual serves additional time
by finishing out less than one-half of another person’s term.) An
individual’s service is restricted to six years in the Assembly (three
two-year terms) and eight years in the Senate (two four-year terms).
Under current law, there are no limits on terms in office based on a
legislator’s fundraising or campaign contributions.
Proposal
Time Limits Based on Fundraising and
Consecutive Terms Served. This measure replaces existing term
limits with new requirements. Specifically, the measure would limit the
number of consecutive terms in office that an individual could
serve. (Current law limits the total number of terms in office, rather
than the number of consecutive terms in office.) Under the measure, an
individual could serve up to 8 consecutive years in the Assembly (four
two-year terms) and up to 12 consecutive years in the Senate (three
four-year terms). The measure, however, does not preclude service beyond
these lengths as long as the terms are not consecutive. In other words,
an individual could serve three four-year terms in the Senate, followed
by four two-year terms in the Assembly, and then return to the Senate.
In addition, under the measure, an incumbent legislator could only serve
an additional term if the individual received no campaign contributions
or privately funded “junkets” (not defined by the measure) during a
current term in office.
Fiscal Effects
By altering term limits for Members of the
Legislature, the measure would likely change which individuals are
serving in the Legislature at any time. This would not have any direct
fiscal effect on total state spending or revenues. The different
composition of the Legislature, however, would likely lead to different
decisions being made—for example on legislation and the state
budget—than would otherwise be the case. These decisions could have an
effect on state spending and revenues. Any such indirect impacts,
however, are unknown and impossible to estimate.
Fiscal Summary. This measure would
have no direct fiscal effect on state or local governments.
Return to Initiatives and Propositions
Return to Legislative Analyst's Office Home Page