January 6, 2010
Pursuant to Elections
Code Section 9005, we have reviewed the proposed constitutional initiative
relating to state and local approval requirements for taxes, fees, and penalties
(A.G. File No. 09‑0092).
Background
Taxes
State Taxes.
The State Constitution
requires a two-thirds vote of each house of the Legislature for measures that
result in increases in revenues from imposing new state taxes or changing
existing state taxes. This has been interpreted to allow measures that do not
result in a net increase in state taxes to be adopted by majority vote. For
example, a measure that results in higher taxes for some taxpayers but an equal
(or larger) reduction in taxes levied on other taxpayers would not result in an
aggregate increase in taxes. Under current practice, this type of measure could
be passed by a majority vote.
Local Taxes. Local governments may impose or increase taxes (other than ad
valorem property taxes) subject to the approval of their local voters. If the
local government proposes to use the tax proceeds for general purposes (a
"general tax"), the tax requires approval by a majority of local voters. If the
tax proceeds are earmarked for a specific purpose (a "special tax"), the voter
approval threshold is two-thirds. In some cases, local governments place
nonbinding "companion measures" on the same ballot with proposed general tax
increases. These advisory measures express voter intent regarding the
expenditure of funds raised by general taxes. The Constitution currently does
not specify the vote requirement for the Legislature to pass a law that has the
effect of increasing local tax revenues.
Fees, Assessments, Fines, and Other Charges
Current law generally gives state and local
governments significant discretion in establishing fees, assessments, fines,
penalties, and other charges. Governments may impose these charges for many
reasons, including to offset their costs to provide specific services and
benefits ("user fees"), regulate a particular activity ("regulatory fees"),
penalize certain behaviors ("penalties"), and finance property or business
improvements ("assessments").
In some cases—such as many user fees, admission fees, and
assessments—the charge is closely linked to the cost of providing a particular
service to an individual
beneficiary. In other cases—particularly regulatory fees (including
environmental mitigation)—the charge may be based on the costs of government
oversight of a group or industry, or on the social costs associated with
particular activities. Figure 1 provides some examples of state and local fees
imposed for broad regulatory purposes.
Imposing Fees, Assessments, and Charges. The
state generally may impose fees, assessments, and charges by a majority vote of
the Legislature, provided these charges do not exceed government's related
costs. (State charges in excess of costs are considered "taxes" and are subject
to the Constitution's approval requirements for taxes.)
With three exceptions, local governments generally have similar authority to
impose fees, assessments, and charges. Specifically, state law requires local
governments to obtain the approval of business owners before imposing
assessments to finance improvements in business districts. In addition, the
Constitution requires local governments to receive approval from property owners
or voters before imposing (1) property owner assessments or (2) fees as an
incident of property ownership ("property-related fees"), other than fees for
water, sewer, and refuse collection services.
State and Local Requirements Regarding Fines and
Penalties. State and local governments have significant discretion to
set fines and penalties for violations of state laws and local ordinances and to
discourage certain behavior. The Constitution generally does not restrict how
state and local governments spend the funds raised from fines and penalties.
State and local governments may impose most fines and penalties with a majority
vote of the governing body.
Proposal
This measure amends the Constitution to expand the
definitions of a "tax" and subject all state tax increases to voter approval.
Voter Approval of State Taxes. The measure
specifies that any change in a state statute that results in any taxpayer
paying a higher tax requires (1) a two-thirds vote of the Legislature and (2)
majority approval by the statewide electorate. (This would include statutes that
reallocate tax burdens without yielding a net increase in revenues and those
affecting only local taxes.) The measure provides a waiver of the voter-approval
requirement in cases of emergency, as long as the tax expires by the next
statewide election in the year after the emergency.
Definition of Taxes. The measure broadens
the definitions of a state tax and a local special tax to include a wide range
of charges that governments currently may impose by a majority vote of its
governing entity. Specifically, the measure provides that all state and local
charges are taxes, except:
-
User charges, based on a government's reasonable costs,
for specific services or benefits that government provides directly and
exclusively to the fee payer.
-
Regulatory charges limited to a government's reasonable
administrative costs for issuing licenses and permits and undertaking
investigations, inspections, audits, enforcement, and adjudication.
-
Charges for the use of or entrance to state or local
government property.
-
Fines and penalties imposed by government "as a result
of a violation of a law."
-
Local
charges imposed as a condition of property development, property owner
assessments, and property-related fees.
Effective Date for State Provisions. This
measure specifies that any state tax enacted after January 1, 2010 that is
inconsistent with this initiative's provisions would become inoperative 12
months after the effective date of this initiative unless the tax is reenacted
into law in compliance with this initiative's requirements.
Burden of Proof. In any legal challenge,
the measure specifies that government bears the burden of proving that a charge
is not a tax and that the amount raised is consistent with the measure's
provisions.
Fiscal Effects
By expanding the scope of what is considered a tax and
subjecting all state tax increases to voter approval, the measure would make it
more difficult for state and local governments to enact a wide range of measures
that generate revenues.
State Government
The measure makes two significant changes to state
finance. First, the measure redefines a large number of state charges as taxes.
The extent of this change is not clear, but it would appear to include many
regulatory fees that address health and environmental concerns, such as the fees
summarized in Figure 1. Second, the measure requires state statutes that
increase state or local taxes to be approved by a two-thirds vote of the
Legislature and a majority of the state's voters.
The overall revenue impact of this measure would depend
on future actions of the Legislature and voters. Given that state tax and fee
measures frequently total hundreds of millions or billions of dollars, the
measure could result in major decreases in future state revenues and spending
compared to what they otherwise would be.
Local Government
Under the measure, a large number of local charges,
including local regulatory fees and business assessments, would be considered
special taxes. Instead of being approved by a majority of local governing boards
(and, in the case of business assessments, business owners), these charges would
be subject to the approval by two-thirds of local residents.
The overall revenue impact of this measure would depend
on future actions of the local governing bodies and voters.
Given the amount of revenues derived from
these local charges, the higher approval threshold in this measure could result
in major decreases in future local revenues and spending compared to what they
otherwise would be.
Summary
The measure would have the following impacts on state and
local governments:
-
Potentially major decrease in state and local revenues
and spending, depending upon future actions of the Legislature, local
governing bodies, and voters.
Return to Propositions
Return to Legislative Analyst's Office Home Page