November 30, 2011

Pursuant to Elections Code Section 9005, we have reviewed a proposed constitutional amendment related to marriage (A.G. File No. 11‑0058).

Background

California law defines marriage as a personal relationship arising out of a civil contract between two consenting adults. In November 2008, voters passed Proposition 8, which amended the State Constitution to specify that only marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognized in California. However, state law allows couples of the same sex where both partners are at least 18, or unmarried couples of the opposite sex where at least one partner is 62 years or older, to register as domestic partners. In most instances, registered domestic partners are provided the same rights and benefits as married couples. For example, both married individuals and domestic partners are entitled to alimony and community property rights.

Proposal

This measure amends the Constitution to repeal Proposition 8 by defining marriage as between two people and not restricted on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, gender, sexual orientation, or religion. The measure also states that it is not intended to require clergy of any church to perform a service not congruent with their faith.

Fiscal Effect

By repealing Proposition 8, this measure would make marriage between individuals of the same sex valid and recognized in California. As a result, there would likely be additional spending in the state on wedding ceremonies by same-sex couples, including spending by people from outside of California. Particularly in the near term, this spending could increase revenues to state and local governments (primarily through sales tax revenues). Over the longer run, however, this measure would likely have little fiscal impact on state and local governments.

Fiscal Summary. Over the long run, this measure would likely have little fiscal impact on state and local governments.