January 16, 2014
Pursuant to Elections Code Section 9005, we have reviewed the
proposed statutory initiative related to the cultivation, use,
possession, and sale of marijuana (A.G. File No. 13‑0053).
Background
Federal Law. Federal laws classify
marijuana as an illegal substance and provide criminal penalties for
various activities relating to its use. These laws are enforced by
federal agencies that may act independently or in cooperation with state
and local law enforcement agencies.
State Law and Proposition 215. Under
current state law, the possession, cultivation, or distribution of
marijuana generally is illegal in California. Penalties for
marijuana-related activities vary depending on the offense. For example,
possession of less than one ounce of marijuana is an infraction
punishable by a fine, while selling marijuana is a felony and may result
in a jail or prison sentence.
In November 1996, voters approved Proposition 215, which legalized
under state law the cultivation and possession of marijuana in
California for medical purposes. State law also authorizes cities and
counties to regulate the establishment of medical marijuana dispensaries
in their jurisdictions. The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in 2005, however,
that federal authorities could continue under federal law to prosecute
California patients and providers engaged in the cultivation and use of
marijuana for medical purposes. Despite having this authority, the
current policy of the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) is not to
prosecute marijuana users and businesses that act in compliance with
state and local marijuana laws so long as those laws are written and
enforced in a manner that upholds federal priorities. These priorities
include ensuring that marijuana is not distributed to minors or diverted
from states that have legalized marijuana to those that have not. State
and local governments currently collect sales tax on medicinal marijuana
sales.
Proposal
This measure changes state law to legalize the possession,
cultivation, and sale of marijuana. Despite these changes to state law,
activities related to the use of marijuana would continue to be
prohibited under federal law.
State Legalization of Marijuana-Related Activities.
Under the measure, individuals age 21 or over could legally possess,
sell, transport, process, and cultivate marijuana under state law. As
discussed below, the production and sales of specified amounts of
marijuana for recreational, dietary (such as in non-psychoactive foods),
and medical purposes would be subject to regulation by the state and
local governments.
Although the measure would generally legalize marijuana, it would
remain unlawful for individuals to (1) operate a motor vehicle while
under the impairment of marijuana, (2) divert marijuana to another
state, or (3) provide marijuana to individuals under the age of 21. In
addition, the smoking of marijuana in public places would be subject to
the same restrictions that apply to the smoking of tobacco. The measure
also states that state and local governments are prohibited from
enforcing federal prohibitions on marijuana, including providing the
federal government with information obtained in regulating the
marijuana-related activities authorized under the measure. Moreover, the
measure states that no individual can be denied a license or permit
(such as a professional license) for engaging in lawful
marijuana-related activities, with the exception of employees in certain
safety-sensitive occupations (such as airplane pilots or train
conductors).
Regulation of Commercial Marijuana Activities.
This measure establishes the Cannabis Control Commission (CCC)
to regulate the commercial cultivation, processing, distribution, and
sales of marijuana. The measure states that the CCC shall be the sole
state entity authorized to regulate these activities and that neither
the Legislature nor local governments shall further prohibit or
legislate the use or distribution of marijuana beyond the regulations
established in the measure or by the CCC. Local governments could,
however, enforce local zoning and nuisance laws against marijuana
businesses, as described below. Under the measure, the cultivation,
possession, processing, or transportation of up to 12 marijuana plants
(including up to six “mature” plants) per adult, for non-commercial use,
would be exempt from regulation. Individuals or organizations
cultivating greater amounts of marijuana, or engaging in commercial
cultivation, processing, transportation, distribution, or sales of
marijuana would be required to pay a fee and obtain a certificate from
the commission.
Under the measure, existing medical marijuana dispensaries that are
at least 600 feet from K-12 schools would be exempt from any enforcement
actions with respect to local zoning ordinances as well as any new fees
or regulations imposed by the measure or by the commission. In addition,
all existing and future medical marijuana dispensaries would not be
required to obtain a certificate from the CCC in order to operate.
Industrial hemp cultivation is currently prohibited under state and
federal law. The measure states that if industrial hemp cultivation
becomes legal in the future, the cultivation and use of industrial hemp
would be exempt from any regulations or taxes included in the measure.
The measure also authorizes the CCC to monitor compliance with its
regulations; investigate suspected violations; and restrict, suspend, or
revoke business certificates of violators. The measure allows any person
who is denied a marijuana business certificate to appeal to a state
trial court for judicial review. In addition, any business whose
certificate is limited, suspended, or revoked could appeal directly to
the Sacramento County Superior Court for judicial review. The measure
also gives the commission the authority to require local law enforcement
agencies to provide to the commission any materials related to an
investigation or prosecution of an individual for a violation of any law
related to marijuana.
Taxation of Commercial Marijuana Sales. The
measure states that existing state and local sales and use taxes shall
be applied to marijuana sold for recreational use. However, the measure
states that marijuana sold for medical or dietary purposes shall be
exempt from such sales and use taxes. In addition, the measure states
that the Legislature may place an excise tax on the sale of marijuana of
up to 10 percent of the retail price of the product. Revenues collected
from any marijuana excise tax would be deposited in a new special fund,
the Public Benefit Fund. Of the revenues deposited in the Public Benefit
Fund, 20 percent would be allocated annually to fund each of the
following: (1) education; (2) health care; (3) police, sheriff, and fire
services; and (4) drug abuse education and treatment. The measure
authorizes the Legislature and Governor to determine the specific
recipients but requires that at least 67 percent of the amount allocated
to each of these areas be appropriated to counties, cities, or special
districts. The remaining 20 percent, or $7.5 million, whichever is less,
would support the operations of CCC. Any remaining funds would be
transferred to the state General Fund.
Zoning Restrictions for Marijuana Businesses.
Under the measure, the establishment of storefront marijuana businesses
is prohibited within 1,000 feet of any K-12 school. In addition, the
measure allows governments in small cities and counties (fewer than
10,000 residents) to permanently ban storefront marijuana businesses.
Governments in medium-sized cities and counties (between 10,000 and
25,000 residents) could permanently limit the number of storefront
marijuana businesses to one. Governments in large cities and counties
(more than 25,000 residents) could permanently limit the number of
storefront marijuana businesses to one per 25,000 residents. Governments
in medium-sized and large cities and counties could completely ban such
businesses for up to 12 months, but would require voter approval to
establish a permanent ban. The measure also allows local governments to
fully regulate entities that allow on-site consumption of marijuana,
including limiting or banning such entities within their jurisdiction.
Authorization of Criminal and Civil Penalties.
Under the measure, an individual who violates any provision of the
measure or any regulation established by CCC would be subject to civil
fines of up to $10,000 per violation, with repeated violations
punishable as misdemeanor crimes. In addition, the measure states that
it would be a misdemeanor crime punishable by up to one year in jail, a
$10,000 fine, or both, for any CCC commissioner or employee to disclose
information obtained in the performance of their duties to unauthorized
individuals. The measure also states that punishments that currently
exist for violations of regulations related to the sales of alcohol
(such as those related to permissible hours of sale) shall also apply to
violations of similar regulations pertaining to the sale of marijuana
that are adopted by the commission.
In addition, the measure states that the following activities are
crimes punishable as either a fine, misdemeanor, felony, or by a
requirement to attend a marijuana education diversion program that each
county would be required to establish: (1) the diversion of marijuana to
other states; (2) marijuana-related activity used as a cover for the
trafficking of illegal drugs or other illegal activity; (3) the use of
violence, coercion, or duress in the unlawful cultivation or
distribution of marijuana; (4) gross pollution or environmental
destruction caused by unlawful cultivation of marijuana; and (5)
providing marijuana to an individual under the age of 21. Under the
measure, the use, cultivation, or sales of marijuana by individuals
under the age of 21 for nonmedical purposes, would be an infraction
punishable by a fine or by a requirement to attend a county marijuana
education diversion program.
Fiscal Effects
The provisions of this measure would affect both costs and revenues
for state and local governments. The magnitude of the these effects
would depend upon (1) the extent to which the U.S. DOJ exercises its
discretion to enforce federal prohibitions on marijuana activities
otherwise permitted by this measure and (2) how, and to what extent,
state and local governments choose to regulate and tax the commercial
production and sale of marijuana. Thus, the potential revenue and
expenditure impacts of this measure described below are subject to
considerable uncertainty.
Reduction in Various Criminal Justice Costs.
The measure would result in reduced costs to the state and local
governments by reducing the number of marijuana offenders incarcerated
in state prisons and county jails, as well as the number placed under
community supervision (such as county probation). In addition, the
measure would result in a reduction in state and local costs for the
enforcement of marijuana-related offenses and the handling of related
criminal cases in the state court system. In total, these reduced costs
could potentially exceed $100 million annually.
Other Fiscal Effects on State and Local Programs.
The measure could also have fiscal effects on various other state and
local programs. For example, the measure could result in an increase in
the consumption of marijuana, potentially resulting in an unknown
increase in the number of individuals seeking publicly funded substance
abuse treatment and other medical services. This measure could also
potentially reduce both the costs and offsetting revenues of the state’s
Medical Marijuana Program, a patient registry that identifies those
individuals eligible under state law to legally purchase and consume
marijuana for medical purposes. In addition, the measure would result in
costs for the state to regulate the commercial production and sale of
marijuana. Depending on how, and to what extent, CCC chooses to
implement such regulations, these costs could potentially be up to the
low tens of millions of dollars annually. However, these costs could be
largely or entirely offset by registration fees required by the measure
to be levied on marijuana-related businesses, as well as revenues from
any excise tax imposed on marijuana sales.
In addition, the measure could result in costs to state trial courts
from hearing appeals from marijuana businesses aggrieved by the
commission’s decisions. The magnitude of these costs are unknown as they
would depend on the number of appeals filed in response to commission
decisions. The measure could also result in costs to local law
enforcement agencies related to providing the commission with materials
related to marijuana investigations or prosecutions, depending on the
amount and type of information the commission requests from local law
enforcement. Moreover, the measure would result in costs to counties to
create and administer marijuana diversion programs. However, these costs
would be largely offset by fees charged to program participants.
Effects on State and Local Revenues. State
and local governments could receive additional revenues, such as sales
taxes from marijuana sales permitted under this measure. In addition,
state and local governments could also receive revenue from excise
taxes, if such taxes were enacted by the Legislature. As noted earlier,
a portion of the revenues derived from any excise tax imposed by the
Legislature would be deposited in the Public Benefit Fund to benefit
various programs including education, health care, and public safety.
However, since the measure prohibits sales and use taxes on medical and
dietary marijuana products, these revenues would be partially offset by
the loss of sales tax currently collected on medical and dietary
marijuana sales.
In addition, the measure could result in an increase in taxable
economic activity in the state, as businesses and individuals producing
and selling marijuana would pay personal income and corporation taxes.
Moreover, the measure could increase economic activity in the state to
the extent that out-of-state consumers redirect spending into the state.
The magnitude of the net increase in economic activity is unknown and
would depend considerably on the extent to which the federal government
enforces marijuana laws in California. In total, our best estimate is
that the state and local governments could eventually collect net
additional revenues of a few hundred million dollars annually.
Reduction of Existing Fine and Asset Forfeiture Revenues.
The measure could reduce state and local revenues from the collection of
the fines established in current law for marijuana offenses and the
assets that are forfeited in some criminal marijuana cases. We estimate
that these revenues could amount to the low tens of millions of dollars
annually. This could be somewhat offset, however, by additional fine
revenue generated from the new penalties created by the measure (such as
for violating regulations established by CCC).
Summary of Fiscal Effects. We estimate that
this measure would have the following major fiscal effects, which could
vary considerably depending on (1) future actions by the federal
government to enforce federal marijuana laws and (2) how, and to what
extent, state and local governments choose to tax and regulate the
commercial production and sale of marijuana.
- Reduced costs potentially exceeding $100 million annually to
state and local governments related to enforcing certain
marijuana-related offenses, handling the related criminal cases in
the court system, and incarcerating and supervising certain
marijuana offenders.
- Potential net additional tax revenues of a few hundred million
dollars annually related to the production and sale of marijuana, a
portion of which is required to be spent on education, health care,
public safety, drug abuse education and treatment, and the
regulation of commercial marijuana activities.
Return to Initiatives
Return to Legislative Analyst's Office Home Page