May 2023

Community Colleges

CCC Capital Outlay Projects Under Governor's Budget and May Revision

(In Thousands)

    2023-24 All Years
College Project Phase State Cost State Cost Total Costa
Proposed in January     
Proposition 51 (2016)
Sierra New science building C $27,469 $29,814 $58,720
Norco New kinesiology building C 28,555 31,257 54,193
West Valley Theater renovation and expansion C 10,807 11,630 30,663
Chabot Maintenance and operations building replacement C 10,058 10,732 28,977
Los Angeles Mission Plant facilities warehouse and shop replacement C 7,319 7,831 25,921
Shasta Building 800 renovation C 5,974 6,456 11,997
   Subtotals     ($90,182) ($97,720) ($210,471)
Proposition 55 (2004)
Sierra Applied technology center renovation C $18,296 $19,676 $38,587
Cuyamaca Instructional building replacement C 15,925 16,930 33,514
Compton Visual and performing arts building replacement C 12,530 13,328 17,787
Desert Science building renovation C 6,854 7,440 14,879
   Subtotals     ($53,605) ($57,374) ($104,767)
Totals Proposed in January    $143,787 $155,094 $315,238
Added in May     
Redwoods Physical education building replacementb C $72,298 $77,677 $77,703
San Mateo Library renovation (Prop. 51) P, W 1,760 22,250 43,915
Golden West Fine Arts building renovation (Prop. 51) P, W 1,392 16,004 31,276
Grossmont Liberal arts/business/computer science buildings renovationc C 11,464 12,405 24,399
Sierra Applied technology center renovationd (Prop. 55) C 1,600 1,600 3,198
Totals Proposed in May    $88,514 $129,936 $180,491
Grand Totals    $232,301 $285,030 $495,729
           
a Community college districts typically issue local general obligation bonds to pay for a share of project costs.    
b The 2019-20 Budget Act originally approved the preliminary plans and working drawings for this project, with the 2021-22 Budget Act approving the construction phase (at a total project cost of $69.2 million). The administration indicates that the project has encountered significant project delays due to the need for additional seismic work and other factors. It also faces cost increases. As a result, the May Revision reverts $63.8 million in Proposition 51 bond funds and provides $72.3 million in funds from several bonds (Propositions 1A, 1D, 47, 51, 153, and 203) for the construction phase.
c The 2020-21 Budget Act originally approved the preliminary plans and working drawings for this project, with the 2021-22 Budget Act approving the construction phase (at a total state cost of $21.9 million). Due to delays resulting from the need for additional seismic work, the May Revision reverts $10.2 million in Proposition 51 bond funds and provides $11.5 million in new Proposition 51 bond funds for the construction phase.
d This project was proposed in January. Due to additional seismic work recently identified by the Division of the State Architect, the May Revision provides these supplemental amounts, bringing cumulative state costs in 2023-24 to $19.9 million, state costs in all years of $21.3 million, and total costs of $41.8 million.
           
P = preliminary plans. W = working drawings. C = construction.