To browse all LAO publications, visit our Publications page.
February 20, 2008 - The state’s current process for administration and funding of over 30 public health programs at the local level is fragmented, inflexible, and fails to hold local health jurisdictions (LHJs) accountable for achieving results. This reduces the effectiveness of these programs because these services are not coordinated or integrated and LHJs cannot focus on meeting the overall goal of improving the public’s health. We recommend (1) the consolidation of certain public health programs into a block grant. and (2) the enactment of legislation that would direct the Department of Public Health (DPH) to develop a model consolidated contract for these and other public health programs (which are not consolidated into the block grant). In addition, we recommend that outcome measures for these programs be developed and that DPH work with counties in using a consolidated contract.
February 20, 2008 - As health care costs continue to face upward cost pressures, many federal, state and private health care programs have turned to pay-for-performance programs as a way of both ensuring the practice of effective and efficient medicine and of controlling costs. Our analysis indicates that the implementation of pay-for-performance program in Medi-Cal could eventually reduce General Fund costs by as much as tens of millions of dollars annually and significantly improve care for patients.
February 20, 2008 - The Governor’s budget proposes to reduce provider reimbursements by $688 million General Fund in 2008-09. We review the potential effects of this proposal and generally find that the proposed reductions might reduce patient access to care or cause patients to obtain care through other more costly access points such as emergency rooms. We recommend that the Legislature reject the proposed reductions for all providers except hospitals. We also recommend additional actions to generate savings in certain areas.
February 20, 2008 - Although IHSS wages represent a significant cost to the state, current law grants local county boards the flexibility to establish IHSS wage levels and requirements for providers who choose to be listed on county registries. In order to improve the IHSS labor force and services to recipients, we recommend, prior to 2010-11, enactment of legislation to modify the structure for state participation in wages to reflect the training and tenure of IHSS providers.
February 20, 2008 - The Governor’s budget proposes to delete the June 2008 and 2009 state statutory COLAs and pass-through the federal COLAs. The Governor estimates that the deletion of these COLAs will result in savings of $23.3 million in 2007-08, and $300.3 million in 2008-09. Based on more recent data, we estimate savings in 2008-09 will increase by $5.3 million to a total of $305.6 million in the budget year. As part of the LAO budget alternative, we recommend reducing grants for couples to 125 percent of the federal poverty level.
February 20, 2008 - The budget proposes to reduce CWS county allocations, resulting in General Fund savings of $83.7 million in 2008-09. We describe the potential impact of this proposed reduction on social worker caseloads and possible subsequent policy consequences resulting from fewer resources. We provide three alternatives to the Governor’s proposal that more narrowly target the reductions in CWS expenditures.
February 20, 2008 - Pre-assistance programs focusing on preparing recipients to enter the labor force within four months and a community service requirement for adults who have received five years of assistance are two policies which would increase participation with less budgetary savings than the Governor. We discuss these alternatives, estimate their impacts, and present an alternative package of CalWORKs reforms which meet the anticipated work participation shortfall.
February 20, 2008 - In order to increase work participation and achieve budgetary savings, the Governor proposes a series policy changes for the CalWORKs program. These are (1) a graduated full-family sanction that increases to 100 percent of the grant after one year in sanction status, (2) a five-year time limit on children whose parents cannot meet federal work participation requirements, (3) a nutritional supplement for working poor families, and (4) a five-year time limit for other child-only cases. We review the Governor’s proposals and comment on them.
February 20, 2008 - Index of Information Technology Issues in the Analysis of the 2008-09 Budget Bill
January 25, 2008 - Elizabeth Hill's Senate Testimony on ABX1 and its related initiative.
January 22, 2008 - We analyzed certain fiscal issues related to the health care reform (HCR) plan currently under consideration by the Legislature. We estimated the fiscal impact of HCR using two different assumptions of premiums: $250 per month per person and $300 per month per person. Under the $250 premium scenario there are sufficient revenues to support the program in the first year of operation (2010-11). However, by the fifth year of the program, annual costs exceed revenues by $300 million. Despite annual costs exceeding revenues in the fifth year, the program still has a positive cumulative fund balance because the collection of tobacco tax and employer fees start before program costs are incurred. Under the $300 premium assumption, costs exceed revenues by $122 million in the first year of operation and this shortfall increases to $1.5 billion by the fifth year of the program. In addition, the fund balance shows a deficit of almost $4 billion by the end of that period, even with the early collection of the tobacco tax and employer fees. In addition to the premium level, we have identified a number of other fiscal risks and uncertainties which could negatively affect the fiscal solvency of the plan by more than an additional $1.5 billion annually.
October 31, 2007 - Presented to Assembly Health Committee, Mervyn M. Dymally, Chair
October 16, 2007 - Presented to the Assembly Budget Subcommittee No. 1 on Health and Human Services
April 23, 2007 - Presented to: Assembly Budget subcommittee No. 1 on Health and Human Services
March 28, 2007 - Presented to Assembly Budget Subcommittee No. 1