Back to 2014 Issues

 

2014

Other Budget Issues

Last Updated: 2/20/2014
Budget Issue: Implementation of the Enterprise Data to Revenue (EDR) project
Program: Franchise Tax Board
Finding or Recommendation: Adjust administration's budget proposal to better align permanent workforce with ongoing work.
Further Detail

Background

The Franchise Tax Board (FTB) administers California’s income tax programs. The FTB uses information technology (IT) systems to process taxpayer returns and collect tax revenue. The Enterprise Data to Revenue (EDR) project will modernize several legacy IT systems. In addition, EDR is expected to collect and analyze more taxpayer information than is currently cost-effective. FTB expects that this information can be used to better detect and collect taxes from those who are not paying the amount of taxes they owe.

Staffing Decisions May Affect Payments To Primary Vendor. The EDR project was procured using a “benefit-based” compensation model in which the primary vendor is paid, in part, based on increases in state revenue directly attributable to the project. While it is impossible to determine whether a dollar of increased revenue is due solely to the implementation of EDR or an external factor (such as economic changes or statutory changes), the FTB has a process in place to estimate EDR-related revenue. In this process, staffing levels are an important consideration. On one hand, maintaining a baseline level of staff is important to ensure that prior revenue streams continue to flow to the state. On the other hand, additional staff may need to be added to take advantage of new information provided by the EDR project and realize new revenue. FTB claims that redirecting staff to handle new EDR-related workload could lead to a decline in baseline revenue, complicate the implementation of EDR, and affect levels of payments to the primary vendor.

Over Time, EDR Project Will Likely Shift Staffing Needs Within FTB. The EDR project is expected to automate several labor-intensive processes and make other tasks more efficient. At the same time, EDR is increasing the amount and quality of data available to auditors and other staff that are tasked with collecting revenue, investigating fraud, and improving taxpayer compliance. Consequently, we expect that some divisions will need to permanently reduce staffing levels and others will need to permanently increase staffing levels. At this time, it is unclear what the ongoing staffing needs will be. The administration has indicated that it will comprehensively review key FTB divisions following the implementation of EDR.

Administration’s Budget Proposal

Budget Change Proposal (BCP) 1 Continues Implementation of EDR Project. The Governor’s budget for 2014-15 proposes appropriating $75.1 million from the General Fund to the FTB for 71 positions and anticipated payments to the primary vendor for continued implementation of the EDR project. Specifically, this item would provide for 23 new permanent positions, 42 limited-term positions, and 6 temporary help positions related to EDR implementation.

BCP 2 Reestablishes Limited-Term Positions. The Governor’s budget plan also proposes $7.7 million from the General Fund to the FTB to reestablish 101 expiring two-year limited-term positions for tax collection activities.

LAO Recommendations

Position Establishment Should Consider Workload History and Nature of Work. The EDR project will permanently increase the amount of taxpayer data available to FTB staff, allowing them to better detect tax fraud and taxpayer non-compliance. Some of the new positions requested are needed to handle the increased amount of work generated by this improvement in the quality and quantity of information. While this workload will likely be ongoing, assuming there is no corresponding change in taxpayer behavior, the future volume of work is still uncertain.

We recommend that the Legislature increase somewhat the number of new permanent positions the FTB is allowed to establish in order to better retain staff to those positions. (It is often more difficult to attract and retain staff in limited-term positions.) In other instances, however, we recommend the Legislature only authorize certain positions on a two-year limited-term basis until a sufficient workload history has been established. Our specific recommendations are as follows:

  • Approve 6 Audit Positions on Limited-Term Basis, 9 Positions Permanently. We recommend that, of the 15 permanent positions requested for the audit division, the Legislature approve 6 of those positions—specifically, 6 of the 13 tax auditor positions—on a two-year limited-term basis. This is a new activity and, while we understand that it will be ongoing, we note that the ongoing level of work is uncertain at this time. Approving some of these positions on a limited-term basis would allow the state to reexamine the need for these 6 positions, or a smaller or greater number, on a permanent basis in several years once an actual workload history has been established.
  • Approve 2 Fraud and Discovery Positions on Limited-Term Basis, 4 Positions Permanently. We recommend that, of the 6 permanent positions requested for the fraud and discovery section, the Legislature approve 2 of those positions on a two-year limited-term basis. The EDR fraud detection capabilities will enhance FTB’s ability to stop taxpayer and tax preparer fraud on an ongoing basis. However, this is still a new activity, and we note that at this time FTB is unable to determine the ongoing level of work for two of the six positions requested. Approving some of these positions on a limited-term basis would allow the state to reexamine the need for these 2 positions, or a smaller or greater number, on a permanent basis in several years once an actual workload history has been established.
  • Approve 3 Business Entities Section Positions on Limited-Term Basis, 3 Positions Permanently. We recommend that, of the 6 limited-term positions requested for the Business Entitles Section, the Legislature approve 3 of those positions on a permanent basis. The EDR project is expected to reduce the effort and cost to validate the use of certain business tax credits and allow for a greater level of scrutiny than was previously cost-effective. While we acknowledge that the ongoing level of work is uncertain at this time, we note that this is likely to be an ongoing activity with potentially important positive implications for voluntary taxpayer compliance in the future. Approving some of these positions on a limited-term basis would allow the state to reexamine the need for these 3 positions, or a smaller or greater number, on a permanent basis in several years once an actual workload history has been established.
  • Data Inspection and Information Capture Activities Not Temporary. We recommend that the Legislature approve the 8 data inspector positions and 6 information capture positions on a permanent basis instead of for a limited-term. The need to review and manually update the data that falls out of the EDR-automated processes is not temporary work. Data errors can lead to erroneous bills, notices, or refunds being sent to taxpayers. We note that upon implementation of EDR, the state hopes to see offsetting reductions in other data entry activities that were automated by the project.
  • Web Business Services Activity Not Temporary. We recommend that the Legislature approve this position on a permanent basis instead of for a limited-term. The need for developing and updating Internet content and forms is an ongoing activity.

LAO analysis prepared by: Brian Weatherford. Reviewed by: Jason Sisney.