University of California: Conditions Attached to $50 Million General Fund Increase [EdBudget]

Jul 5, 2017 - Transfer-to-Freshman Ratio. Enroll at least one entering transfer student for every two entering freshmen for the 2018-19 academic year at every campus except Merced and San Francisco. Senior Management Compensation.
https://lao.ca.gov/Education/EdBudget/Details/56

^[PDF] The language of this section does not specifically refer to the

The language of this section does not specifically refer to the transfer made in the 1981--82 year. In order that this section not be interpreted to affect any 1982--83 transfers, which are currently estimated to be zero, we recommend that the language be amended to specifically reference the 1981--82 transfer.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis/1982/15_control_sections_1982.pdf

^[PDF] 1951 Budget Analysis: AERONAUTICS COMMISSION

Where services are performed for cities or counties, reason- able reimbursement might be made from the unrefunded part of the Avia- tion Fuel Tax Fund. During the Fiscal Year 1949-50, $198,684 was paid to counties and $112,666 to cities from unrefunded aviation fuel tax.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis/1951/25_aeronautics_1951.pdf

LAO 2007 Budget Analysis: Judicial Branch (0250)

The request assumes that 68 facilities will transfer to the state by June 30 in addition to the 17 that have already transferred. At this time, however, it is unclear how many of the 68 facilities will actually be transferred by that time.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_2007/crim_justice/cj_02_0250_anl07.aspx

California Counties: A Look at Program Performance, Part 3

Finally, many county sheriffs contract with cities to provide law enforcement services within city boundaries. Ideally, to assess the performance of county sheriff operations, the relative success of the county sheriff in preventing or deterring criminal activity through law enforcement and community-based anticrime activities would be examined.
https://lao.ca.gov/1998/0598_california_counties/0598_california_counties_part_3.html

^[PDF] Homeownership affordability.

California’s cities and counties make most decisions about when, where, and to what extent housing will be built. Specifically, cities and counties enact zoning ordinances to set property-specific land use requirements.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2023/230498.pdf

^[PDF] Statewide Tax on sugar-sweetened drinks.

Revenue Reductions in Four Cities. As noted above, the new statewide tax would reduce consumption of sugar-sweetened drinks. This drop in consumption would reduce local tax revenue in the four cities that currently levy similar taxes.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2018/180384.pdf

^[PDF] The 2023-24 Budget: California Volunteers Proposed Program Expansions

Different cities and counties began their programs at varying times, but all are currently scheduled to end by May 2024 when the existing funds run out. CA Volunteers allocated 80 percent of the $185 million to the largest 13 cities in the state using a population-based formula ($148 million), and granted 19 percent on a competitive basis to 14 other cities and counties ($35 million).
https://lao.ca.gov/reports/2023/4723/CalVolunteers-030123.pdf

^[PDF] Water Special Districts: A Look at Governance and Public Participation

A dependent governing body is one in which the gov- erning body is directly controlled by either a city or county. For dependent districts, a city council or county board of supervisors acts as the district’s ruling body or they appoint individuals for that responsibility who serve at the pleasure of the city or county.
https://lao.ca.gov/2002/water_districts/Special_Water_Districts.pdf

^[PDF] The Transportation Funding Protection Act of 2006 (version 1)

Proposition 42 Transfer. The measure includes voter approval as a third condition to suspend the transfer of Proposition 42 funds beginning in 2007-08. Currently, the transfer may be suspended only if the (1) Governor declares that the transfer would result in a significant negative fiscal impact on the functions of government
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2005/050901.pdf