Results


9,548 results

Sort by date / relevance

[PDF] Humane Economic Liberty Program for California

The collective cost to the state and counties of this measure could thus amount to several billion dollars annually. Counties would experience some unknown partially offsetting savings to the extent that individuals who now receive health services through county indigent health care programs became eligible for assistance through state health care programs, such as Medi-Cal.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2004/040193.pdf

2013 CalFacts

Over one –third of city revenues come from local taxes, the largest of which is the property tax. Special district financing varies significantly based on the type of service the district provides. Ending Redevelopment Increases Revenue to Many Local Governments Prior to their dissolution, redevelopment agencies (RDAs) received over $5 billion in property taxes annually.
https://lao.ca.gov/reports/2013/calfacts/calfacts_010213.aspx

Major Features of the 1999 California Budget

Background The VLF is an annual fee on the ownership of a registered vehicle in California, levied in place of taxing vehicles as personal property. The revenues are distributed to cities and counties.
https://lao.ca.gov/1999/99_budget_features.html

[PDF] State Reimbursement of Mandated Local Costs: A Review of Statutes Funded in 1987

Chapter VIII Mobilehome Property Tax Postponement 1. Chapter 1051, Statutes of 1983, imposes a mandate because it requires counties to proc- ess certificates ofeligibility, and file them with the State Controller's Qffice (SCQ), notify the SCQ of changes in ownership, and conduct various other activities related to the Mobile- home Property Tax Postponement Program. 2.
https://lao.ca.gov/reports/1988/544_0488_state_reimbursement_of_mandated_costs.pdf

2004-05 Budget Perspectives and Issues: Perspectives on State Revenues

This is a uniform local tax rate of 1.25  percent levied by all counties (the so-called Bradley-Burns rate). Of this total, 0.25  percent is deposited into county transportation funds, while the remaining 1  percent is allocated to city and county governments for their general purposes.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_2004/2004_pandi/pi_part_3_anl04.htm

calupdate_1099

calupdate_1099 1.2 0.8 The discrepancies between commitment rates probably result from variations in charging practices of county prosecutors and sentencing patterns of county courts. For example, both t he Counties of Alameda and San Francisco have generally chosen to restrict prosecutions of persons as third strikers to those accused of committing a new violent or serious offense , rather than any felony offense as the law permits.
https://lao.ca.gov/1999/cal_update/oct_99/oct_99_calupdate.html

[PDF] Related to the cultivation, use, possession, and sale of marijuana. Amendment #1

The measure would result in reduced costs to the state and local governments by reducing the number of marijuana offenders incarcerated in state prisons and county jails, as well as the number placed under community supervision (such as county probation).
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2015/150457.pdf

[PDF] The Control, Regulate and Tax Marijuana Act

The measure would result in reduced costs to the state and local governments by reducing the number of marijuana offenders incarcerated in state prisons and county jails, as well as the number placed under community supervision (such as county probation).
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2013/130769.pdf

2013 Initiative Analysis: The Control, Regulate and Tax Marijuana Act

The measure would result in reduced costs to the state and local governments by reducing the number of marijuana offenders incarcerated in state prisons and county jails, as well as the number placed under community supervision (such as county probation).
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2013/130769.aspx