^[PDF] The Protect Our Homes Act

The measure defines the term public use to exclude taking private property to transfer it to a nongovernmental owner for economic development, tax revenue enhancement, or other purposes that are not public use projects.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2005/051016.pdf

2006 Initiative Analysis: California Border Police Act

The measure also provides CBP with the authority to use state and local prisons and jails to incarcerate detainees until they are transferred to federal im migration authorities. Fiscal Effect The fiscal effect of this measure would depend on a number of factors.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2006/060011.htm

^[PDF] California Border Police Act

The measure also provides CBP with the authority to use state and local prisons and jails to incarcerate detainees until they are transferred to federal immigration authorities. Fiscal Effect The fiscal effect of this measure would depend on a number of factors.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2006/060011.pdf

^[PDF] Redistricting Reform: The Empowering Democracy Act

. • The plan must minimize the splitting of counties and cities into multiple districts. • After meeting the other requirements, the plan would also aim to maximize the number of “competitive” districts.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2006/060012.pdf

^[PDF] The California Clean Money and Fair Elections Act of 2006 (Amendment #2-S.)

Any amount over this limit would be transferred to the General Fund. Insufficient Funds. If sufficient dollars are not available to fully fund the measure’s provisions, the measure authorizes FPPC to proportionately reduce the amount of funds available to each candidate.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2006/060075.pdf

2006 Initiative Analysis: The Repeat Criminal Offender/Three Strikes Fair Sentencing Act of 2006

Alternatively, there could be offsetting loss of revenue to the extent that offenders serving longer prison terms would have become taxpaying citi zens under current law. The extent and magnitude of these impacts is unknown but potentially significant.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2006/060112.htm

2006 Initiative Analysis: Homeowners' Measure of Rights Act of 2006 (Amendment #1-S)

If cities failed to comply with some of these provisions, the measure would hold them financially liable for any neces sary repairs. Increasing the disclosure of information by builders. Making it easier for homeowners to recover attorney and expert costs in construction defect cases.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2006/060142.htm

^[PDF] Homeowners' Measure of Rights Act of 2006 (Amendment #1-S)

In addition, if an individual city failed to comply with the measure’s requirement to provide access to construction records, it could result in increased government costs to pay for home repairs. Finally, some of the increased costs, such as for the fingerprinting of contractors, would be covered by fee revenues.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2006/060142.pdf

2006 Initiative Analysis: Due Process for Residents With Land Use or Property Issues

This measure would have the following fiscal impact: ·                 Unknown, but probably not significant, increased costs to cities and counties.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2006/060265.htm

^[PDF] Due Process for Residents With Land Use or Property Issues

Major Provisions Current law generally requires city and county governing boards and planning commissions to post their agendas at least three days before a meeting and publish notices of upcoming legislative actions ten days before the hearing.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2006/060265.pdf