2004 Initiative Analysis: Public employee retirement contributions

Over the last 25 years, the state has paid between 12  percent and 21  percent annually on average for most of its employees. In total, the state and local governments have paid, on average, in the low billions of dollars annually for retirement cont ributions.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2005/050022.htm

2005 Initiative Analysis: The California Public Employee Pension Reform Act

Over the last 25 years, the state has paid between 12  percent and 21  percent annually on average for most of its employees. In total, the state and local governments have paid, on average, in the low billions of dollars annually for retirement co ntributions.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2005/050183.htm

^[PDF] The California Public Employee Pension Reform Act

Over the last 25 years, the state has paid between 12 percent and 21 percent annually on average for most of its employees. In total, the state and local governments have paid, on average, in the low billions of dollars annually for retirement contributions.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2005/050183.pdf

^[PDF] Major Features of the 2007 California Budget

The 2007‑08 budget pro‑ vides for growth in trial court operations funding based on the annual change in the state ap‑ propriations limit ($127 million) and partial‑year funding for 100 new superior court judgeships ($25 million).
https://lao.ca.gov/2007/major_features/major_features_2007.pdf

2009-10 Budget Analysis Series: Overview of the Governor’s Budget

The Governor ’s budget –year proposal also contains a set of new reductions and augmentations —resulting in a modest net reduction in year –to –year programmatic spending. The largest new savings proposal is to allow districts to shorten the K –12 school year by up to five days.
https://lao.ca.gov/2009/budget_overview/09-10_budget_ov.aspx

2002 Budget Analysis: P&I, Using Borrowing to Help Address the Budget Problem

It is currently estimated that these payments will total about $21  billion for the 25-year period 1998 through 2023. One half of that total —about $10.6  billion —will go to the state, while the other half will be divided among California's local governments.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_2002/2002_pandi/pi_part_5a_borrowing_anl02.html

^[PDF] The Fund Schools on Time Act of 2014

Harris 2 November 13, 2013 years, as the state’s cash situation has improved, the state has not implemented intra-year deferrals. State Has Used Inter-Year School Deferrals for One-Time Budgetary Savings.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2013/130575.pdf

2013 Initiative Analysis:The Fund Schools on Time Act of 2014

In recent years, as the state ’s cash situation has improved, the state has not implemented intra-year deferrals. State Has Used Inter-Year School Deferrals for One-Time Budgetary Savings. In addition to using intra -year deferrals for short-term cash flow, the state has used inter -year deferrals for budgetary savings.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2013/130575.aspx

The 2017-18 Budget: Analysis of the May Revision Education Proposals

May 15, 2017 - Not Automatically Providing Statutory Supplemental Appropriation Provides Legislature With More Budget Flexibility in Future Years. Not providing the supplemental appropriation could lead to somewhat slower growth in school funding in future years.
https://lao.ca.gov/Publications/Report/3670

^[PDF] Fund Schools on Time Act of 2014-Version 3

Harris 2 December 10, 2013 years, as the state’s cash situation has improved, the state has not implemented intra-year deferrals. State Has Used Inter-Year School Deferrals for One-Time Budgetary Savings.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2013/130657.pdf