LAO 2006 Budget Perspectives and Issues: Major Expenditure Proposals In the 2006-07 Budget

In 2004-05, the state transferred property tax revenues to local governments as part of a (1) vehicle license fee revenue “swap,” and (2) a financing mechanism to pay off the deficit-financing bonds passed by the voters in March 2004.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_2006/2006_pandi/pi_05_anl06.html

^[PDF] Analysis of the 2008-09 Budget Bill, Education Chapter

While the division of funds between the two types of activities mirrors the existing division of funding, we would suggest providing significant district flex- ibility to transfer funds between the two grants.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_2008/education/ed_anl08.pdf

^[PDF] "The California Live Within Our Means Act"

Proposal This measure prohibits the suspension of Proposition 42 transfers after 2006-07. The total amount of transfers that were suspended through June 30, 2007 would be paid within 15 years, at an annual rate of no less than one-fifteenth of the cumulative amount owed.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2005/050100.pdf

2005 Initiative Analysis: The California Public Employee Pension Reform Act

Some cities and counties have their own retirement boards to administer their plans. Other cities, counti es, and special districts contract with PERS or their county retirement systems to administer their plans.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2005/050183.htm

^[PDF] The Self-Defense Initiative

While the Second Amendment confers specific rights regarding the right to bear arms, the courts have allowed federal, state, and local governments to establish prohibitions and restrictions on firearm ownership.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2005/050812.pdf

^[PDF] The Transportation Funding Protection Act of 2006 (version 1)

Proposition 42 Transfer. The measure includes voter approval as a third condition to suspend the transfer of Proposition 42 funds beginning in 2007-08. Currently, the transfer may be suspended only if the (1) Governor declares that the transfer would result in a significant negative fiscal impact on the functions of government
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2005/050901.pdf

2005 Initiative Analysis: California Property Owners Protection Act

Provisions Related to Eminent Domain Authority This measure requires public agencies to adopt a resolution of necessity specifying a public use for property before it is taken or damaged The measure broadly defines the term “ private use” (for which public agencies may not use eminent domain) to include: Property ownership transfers to a person or entity other than the public agency.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2005/050967.htm

^[PDF] The Solar and Clean Energy Act of 2008

The measure specifies that the Energy Commission will hold title to any properties acquired with funds in the So- lar and Clean Energy Transmission Account and gives the commission the authority to exercise its ownership rights over any such property.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2007/070788.pdf

^[PDF] The California Cannabis Hemp Initiative of 2014

Currently, many cities and counties restrict the locations where medical marijuana dispensaries can operate, and some local jurisdictions have prohibited the establishment of dispensaries altogether.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2014/140072.pdf

^[PDF] The Online Privacy Act

The measure allows such individuals, the California Attorney General, any district or city attorney, or county counsel to bring civil action against operators of any online service that violates the restrictions established by this measure.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2014/140112.pdf