^[PDF] Proposition 41: Public Aid and Medical Assistance Programs

THE REMAINING REDUCTIONS WOULD HAVE HAD TO BE ACHIEVED BY REDUCING EXPENDITURES FOR STATE AND COUNTY PERSONNEL EMPLOYED TO ADMINISTER THESE PROGRAMS AND OTHER OPERATING EXPENSES. FINALLY, THE REDUCTION OF FEDERAL EXPENDITURES IN CALIFORNIA THAT WOULD HAVE RESULTED FROM IMPLEMENTATION OF PROPOSITION 41 IN 1983 WOULD HAVE BROUGHT ABOUT, OVER TIME, A REDUCTION IN STATE AND LOCAL TAX REVENUES IN THE GENERAL MAGNITUDE OF $250 MILLION PER YEAR.
https://lao.ca.gov/reports/1984/proposition_41_public_aid_and_medical_assistance_program.pdf

^[PDF] The enforcement of and sentencing for certain criminal offenses.

Approved by voters in 2004, MHSA placed a 1 percent tax on incomes over $1 million and dedicated the associated revenues of roughly $2 billion annually to mental health services. Up to 5 percent of this funding goes to the state to administer the MHSA.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2019/190617.pdf

^[PDF] An Overview of the 1990-91 Governor's Budget

Shifting Costs to Counties (-$157 million). The budget includes two proposals which will, at least in part, result in a shift of program costs to county governments. These include a proposed reduction of $150 million in the AB 8 county health services program (which requires legislation) and a shift ofstate costs for property tax programs to local funding sources.
https://lao.ca.gov/1990/reports/0290_overview_of_the_1990-91_governors%20budget.pdf

2007 Initiative Analysis: California Flat Tax

Thus, the combined state-local SUT rate among counties varies from 7.25 percent to 8.75  percent, with a statewide weighted-average rate of 7.94 percent. Proposition 42 Funding Proposition 42, passed by the electorate in 2002, permanently directs to transportation purposes SUT revenues from gasoline sales, which previously had been deposited in the General Fund.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2007/070642.aspx

Proposition 27 [Ballot]

Nov 8, 2022 - These expenses include: (1)  any bets made with credits from promotional offers, (2)  prize payments, and (3)  federal gambling taxes. Losses, which result when expenses are more than bets, may be used to offset these payments.
https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis/Proposition?number=27&year=2022

Proposition 18 [Ballot]

Nov 3, 2020 - Fiscal Effects Minor Costs for County Election Officials. This measure would increase the number of people eligible to vote in primary and special elections. This would increase work for county election officials.
https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis/Proposition?number=18&year=2020

The 2018-19 Budget: California Hiring Tax Credits [Publication Details]

Mar 15, 2018 - The 2018-19 Budget: California Hiring Tax Credits [Publication Details] Translate Our Website This Google ™ translation feature provided on the Legislative Analyst's Office (LAO) website is for informational purposes only.
https://lao.ca.gov/Publications/Detail/3784

The 2022-23 Budget: Overview of the Spending Plan

Oct 12, 2022 - SAL = state appropriations limit; CAC = California Arts Council; CSSSA = California State Summer School for the Arts; CDE = California Department of Education; CDFA = California Department of Food and Agriculture; CSL = California State Library; CTC = Commission on Teacher Credentialing; DCA = Department of Consumer Affairs; DCC = Department of Cannabis Control; DFPI = Departm ent of Financial
https://lao.ca.gov/Publications/Report/4616/1

^[PDF] Understanding Proposition 218

(b) ''Local government” means any county, city, city and county, including a charter city or county, any special district, or any other local or regional governmental entity. (c) ''Special district” means an agency of the state, formed pursuant to general law or a special act, for the local performance of governmental or proprietary 43 Appendix
https://lao.ca.gov/1996/120196_prop_218/understanding_prop218_1296.pdf

The 2023-24 Budget: Financing Approaches for Capital Outlay Projects

Feb 28, 2023 - Taxable bonds are projected to have about 7  percent interest rates in fall 2023 —or 1.35  percent higher than tax-exempt bonds. As a result, the annual debt service savings on these taxable bonds is about $5  million more than tax-exempt bonds.
https://lao.ca.gov/Publications/Report/4709