2005 Initiative Analysis: The High Quality Classroom Act.

A portion of the additional revenue raised from the property tax increase would backfill losses to the General Fund resulting from declines in personal income tax and corpo ration tax revenues. These revenue declines would occur as a result of larger tax deductions associated with the increased property tax payments by commercial property owners.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2005/050066.htm

^[PDF] The High Quality Classroom Act.

A portion of the additional revenue raised from the property tax increase would backfill losses to the General Fund resulting from declines in personal income tax and corporation tax revenues. These revenue declines would occur as a result of larger tax deductions associated with the increased property tax payments by commercial property owners.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2005/050066.pdf

2005 Initiative Analysis: Vote requirements to pass ballot measures

Likewise, Proposition  62, approved by the voters in 1986, requires the approval of new local general taxes in many cities by two-thirds of the governing body (as well as a majority of local voters).
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2005/050068.htm

^[PDF] California Mimimum Wage Initiative

California Mimimum Wage Initiative • • To the extent that the higher minimum wage resulted in less employment and economic activity in the state, taxes from a variety of sources would decline. On balance, the economic and revenue factors described above would likely result in some net decline in state and local government revenues.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2005/050074.pdf

2005 Initiative Analysis: Corporate Tax Accountability Act

Background Information Current Tax Law. California levies taxes on the income of both individuals and businesses through the personal income tax and CT. State law includes special tax provisions for certain business-rel ated activities that result in lower tax liabilities than would otherwise occur.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2005/050076.htm

^[PDF] Corporate Tax Accountability Act

Background Information Current Tax Law. California levies taxes on the income of both individuals and businesses through the personal income tax and CT. State law includes special tax provisions for certain business-related activities that result in lower tax liabilities than would otherwise occur.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2005/050076.pdf

2005 Initiative Analysis: The California Live Within Our Means Act (version1)

Proposal This measure requires that a tax measure be subject to the two-thirds vote requirement if it results in a tax increase for any individual taxpayer—regardless of whether it raises or lowers aggregate taxes.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2005/050083.htm

^[PDF] "The California Live Within Our Means Act"

Proposal This measure requires that a tax measure be subject to the two-thirds vote requirement if it results in a tax increase for any individual taxpayer—regardless of whether it raises or lowers aggregate taxes.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2005/050083.pdf

^[PDF] "The California Live Within Our Means Act"

Bill Lockyer 5 March 2, 2005 Proposition 42 Transfers Current Law Under Proposition 42 (approved by the voters in March 2002), sales taxes on motor vehicle fuel are transferred to the Transportation Investment Fund (TIF) for public transit, capital improvement projects, and maintenance projects.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2005/050084.pdf

2005 Initiative Analysis: The Economic Recovery Tax Relief Act (version 1)

Tax Incidence There would be significant differences in the type of taxpayer experiencing increased taxes and those benefiting from reduced taxes. Taxes would increase on businesses paying the property tax, insurance tax, the CT and the PIT.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2005/050085.htm