2005 Initiative Analysis: The Clean Alternative Energy Act (version 1), Amendment #2-S

Proposal Severance Tax on Oil Production in California. Beginning in January 2007, the measure would impose a severance tax on oil production in California. (The term severance tax is commonly used to describe a tax on the production of any mineral or product taken from the ground, including oil.)
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2005/050987.htm

2005 Initiative Analysis: The Clean Alternative Energy Act (version 2), Amendment #2-S

Proposal Severance Tax on Oil Production in California. Beginning in January 2007, the measure would impose a severance tax on oil production in California. (The term severance tax is commonly used to describe a tax on the production of any mineral or product taken from the ground, including oil.)
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2005/050988.htm

^[PDF] The Clean Alternative Energy Act (version 2), Amendment #2-S

Proposal Severance Tax on Oil Production in California. Beginning in January 2007, the measure would impose a severance tax on oil production in California. (The term severance tax is commonly used to describe a tax on the production of any mineral or product taken from the ground, including oil.)
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2005/050988.pdf

2005 Initiative Analysis: The Tobacco Tax Act of 2006 (Amendment #1-NS)

Background Tobacco Taxes Existing Tax Rate. Current state law imposes excise taxes on cigarettes and other tobacco products. The state’s cigarette tax is currently 87 cents per pack (with an equivalent tax on other types of tobacco products) and is levied on cigarette distributors who supply cigarettes to retail stores.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2005/050993.htm

^[PDF] The Tobacco Tax Act of 2006

BACKGROUND Tobacco Taxes Existing Tax Rate. Current state law imposes excise taxes on cigarettes and other tobacco products. The state’s cigarette tax is currently 87 cents per pack (with an equivalent tax on other types of tobacco products) and is levied on cigarette distributors who supply cigarettes to retail stores.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2005/050993.pdf

2005 Initiative Analysis: The Worker Empowerment Act (version 1)

Increased costs may reduce bu siness profitability, thereby decreasing income tax revenues. Partially offsetting this decrease could be a gain in the gross premiums tax paid by insurance companies. The net ef fect of these impacts is not possible to estimate.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2005/051005.htm

2005 Initiative Analysis: The Worker Empowerment Act (version 2)

Increased costs may reduce bu siness profitability, thereby decreasing income tax revenues. Partially offsetting this decrease could be a gain in the gross premiums tax paid by insurance companies. The net ef fect of these impacts is not possible to estimate.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2005/051006.htm

^[PDF] The Worker Empowerment Act (version 2)

Increased costs may reduce business profitability, thereby decreasing income tax revenues. Partially offsetting this decrease could be a gain in the gross premiums tax paid by insurance companies. The net effect of these impacts is not possible to estimate.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2005/051006.pdf

^[PDF] The Worker Empowerment Act (version 3)

Increased costs may reduce business profitability, thereby decreasing income tax revenues. Partially offsetting this decrease could be a gain in the gross premiums tax paid by insurance companies. The net effect of these impacts is not possible to estimate.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2005/051007.pdf

2005 Initiative Analysis: The Protect Our Homes Act

The measure defines the term public use to exclude taking private property to transfer it to a nongovernmental owner for economic development, tax revenue enhancement, or other purposes that are not public use projects.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2005/051016.htm