New Funding Model for Special Education -- Part II

Federal funds are included in the statewide per-capita amount, along with General Fund support and special education's share of property taxes. Each year's COLA and growth amounts are calculated based on total program funding, including federal funds and local property taxes, not just the General Fund amount.
https://lao.ca.gov/1995/110195_special_ed/se1195b.html

October 1995 Cal Update

Cities and Counties Relying upon earlier Court of Appeal opinions on Proposition 62, many California cities and counties imposed general taxes in recent years without submitting the tax to a vote of t he electorate.
https://lao.ca.gov/1995/cal_update/cup1095.html

December 1995 California Update

During these months, individuals and corporations make th e last prepayment twoard their 1995 tax liabilities, and retailers remit sales tax payments related to the important 1995 Christmas shopping season.
https://lao.ca.gov/1995/cal_update/cup1295.html

1995 June California Update

Sales taxes experienced the largest gain--up $101 million. About $80 million of the $85 million corporation tax gain is related to an audit assessment, of which about $50 million had been expected in June.
https://lao.ca.gov/1995/cal_update/cup695.html

1995 September California Update

Figure 2 summarizes the major fiscal effects of the proposals on state/county funds. The net effect on state/county funds depends on several variables, the most significant being: Whether the state chooses to backfill for lost federal fund in order to maintain current service levels.
https://lao.ca.gov/1995/cal_update/cup995.html

. {+ (2) Existing law authorizes the Franchise

. {+ (2) Existing law authorizes the Franchise Tax Board to provide specified types of tax information to certain public entities, subject to specified conditions regarding confidentiality , including misdemeanor penalties for disclosure, and review of the use of the information.
https://lao.ca.gov/1995/sb256_95.txt

(g) To cooperate with and to secure the cooperation of

(g) To cooperate with and to secure the cooperation of county, city, city and county, and other local law enforcement agencies in investigating any matter within the scope of its duties and responsibilities, and to direct the sheriff of any county or any marshal to serve subpoenas, orders, and other process.
https://lao.ca.gov/1995/sb523_95.txt

^[PDF] Child Abuse and Neglect in California

As shown on page 21, there is significant varia- tion among the counties in the percentage of reports that are “screened out” at the initial contact stage. Among the large counties, it ranges from 19 percent in Los Angeles County to 55 percent in Contra Costa County.
https://lao.ca.gov/1996/010596_child_abuse/cw0196.pdf

Child Abuse and Neglect in California - Part III

Foster Care Placements Vary Among Largest Counties 1994 In June, 1994 the foster care placement rate varied from 4 per 1,000 children in Orange County to 16 per 1,000 children in Los Angeles County. The variation may be partly due to differences in demographic factors, such as poverty, or in efforts to prevent out-of-home placements.
https://lao.ca.gov/1996/010596_child_abuse/cw11096c.html

Child Abuse and Neglect in California - Part IV

As shown on page 21, there is significant variation among the counties in the percentage of reports that are "screened out" at the initial contact stage. Among the large counties, it ranges from 19 percent in Los Angeles County to 55 percent in Contra Costa County.
https://lao.ca.gov/1996/010596_child_abuse/cw11096d.html