2006 Initiative Analysis: The Safe and Sound Homes Act of 2006 (version 1)

If, however, the measure resulted in a large number of suspensions, it could have a significant effect on the building industry (and potentially state and local tax revenues). Fiscal Summary. This measure would have the following fiscal impact: Probably minor increase in state costs and fees related to the licensing of building contractors.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2006/060029.htm

^[PDF] The Safe and Sound Homes Act of 2006 (version 1)

If, however, the measure resulted in a large number of suspensions, it could have a significant effect on the building industry (and potentially state and local tax revenues). Hon. Bill Lockyer 3 February 17, 2006 Fiscal Summary.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2006/060029.pdf

2006 Initiative Analysis: Safe Homes of California Act of 2006 (version 2)

If, however, the measure resulted in a large number of suspensions, it could have a significant effect on the building industry (and potentially state and local tax revenues). Fiscal Summary. This measure would have the following fiscal impact: Probably minor increase in state costs and fees related to the licensing of building contractors.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2006/060030.htm

^[PDF] Safe Homes of California Act of 2006 (version 2)

If, however, the measure resulted in a large number of suspensions, it could have a significant effect on the building industry (and potentially state and local tax revenues). Fiscal Summary. This measure would have the following fiscal impact: • Probably minor increase in state costs and fees related to the licensing of building contractors.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2006/060030.pdf

2006 Initiative Analysis: The California Clean Money and Fair Elections Act of 2006 (Amendment #2-S.)

Fiscal Effect New Tax Revenues. Under the measure, the state would impose increased taxes on corporations and financial institutions. We estimate that the measure would raise over $200  million annually in new tax revenues.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2006/060075.htm

^[PDF] The California Clean Money and Fair Elections Act of 2006 (Amendment #2-S.)

FISCAL EFFECT New Tax Revenues. Under the measure, the state would impose increased taxes on corporations and financial institutions. We estimate that the measure would raise over Hon. Bill Lockyer 5 March 17, 2006 $200 million annually in new tax revenues.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2006/060075.pdf

2006 Initiative Analysis: California Marriage Definition Act

(The law af fects matters such as the receipt of federal benefits and federal taxes.) State Laws. The State Constitution currently does not define marriage. Under current California statute, only marriage between a man and a woman is valid and recognized.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2006/060104.htm

2006 Initiative Analysis: Community College Governance, Funding Stabilization, and Student Fee Reduction Act (Amendment #2-S.)

About two-thirds of the funding that supports community college programs is state General Fund support and local property tax revenues that are counted towards the state Proposit ion  98 spending total.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2006/060105.htm

^[PDF] Community College Governance, Funding Stabilization, and Student Fee Reduction Act (Amendment #2-S.)

About two-thirds of the funding that supports community college programs is state General Fund support and local property tax revenues that are counted towards the state Proposition 98 spending total.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2006/060105.pdf

2006 Initiative Analysis: Fair Pay and Workplace Flexibility Act of 2006

Increases in income for low-wage employees would increase personal income tax re ceipts. To the extent that this higher income was spent on taxable goods, sales tax receipts also could rise. In cases where the higher minimum wage is passed along by businesses to customers in the form of higher product prices, sales tax receipts on those products would also increase.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2006/060127.htm