^[PDF] Health and Human Services Agenda

Revenue from Proposition 56 is anticipated to decline by around 25 percent between 2017-18 and 2018-19 (this reflects the fact that five rather than four quarters of Proposition 56 revenue is available in 2017-18), and decline gradually beyond 2018-19 due to anticipated behavioral responses to the new taxes.
https://lao.ca.gov/handouts/Conf_Comm/2017/Health-and-Human-Services-Agenda-060717.pdf

^[PDF] Education Overview

. ; Higher Property Tax Revenue. Both houses adopt LAO property tax estimates, which are $647 million higher than the administration ($12 million lower in 2016-17, $163 million higher in 2017-18, and $496 million higher in 2018-19).
https://lao.ca.gov/handouts/Conf_Comm/2018/Conference-Education-Overview-053118.pdf

^[PDF] CA Enterprise Zones

Tax returns claiming this incentive grew by 120 percent over the period. Tax credits claimed through amended returns totaled $170 million over the fi ve years 1999 through 2003. The number of employees reported on tax returns grew from 24,190 to 71,150 between 1999 and 2003.
https://lao.ca.gov/handouts/Econ/2005/CA_Enterprise_Zones_120505.pdf

^[PDF] Tax Expenditures: Policy Issues

Tax Expenditures: Policy Issues Presented to: Commission on the 21st Century Economy February 12, 2009 LAO Tax Expenditures—An Alternative To Direct Spending Programs What is the need for the program?
https://lao.ca.gov/handouts/Econ/2009/Tax_Expenditures_2_12_09.pdf

^[PDF] LAO Analysis of COTCE Revenue Proposals

Calderon, Chair LAO Analysis of COTCE Revenue Proposals L E G I S L A T I V E A N A L Y S T ’ S O F F I C E January 13, 2010 1L E G I S L A T I V E A N A L Y S T ’ S O F F I C E January 13, 2010 Projected State Revenues in 2007 COTCE Tax Proposals (In Billions) Actual Estimated COTCE Difference Personal Income Tax $52.1 $39.1 -$13.0 Sales and Use
https://lao.ca.gov/handouts/Econ/2010/COTCE_01_13_10.pdf

^[PDF] Current State R&D Tax Credits

Current State R&D Tax Credits Presented to: Assembly Revenue and Taxation Committee Hon. Henry T. Perea, Chair Current State R&D Tax Credits L E G I S L A T I V E A N A L Y S T ’ S O F F I C E December 5, 2011 LAO 70 YEARS OF SERVICE 1L E G I S L A T I V E A N A L Y S T ’ S O F F I C E December 5, 2011 LAO 70 YEARS OF SERVICE  Economic Rationale for a Subsidy.
https://lao.ca.gov/handouts/Econ/2011/Current_State_R_D_12_5_11.pdf

^[PDF] Impact of Governor’s Spending Cap Proposal On Proposition 98

. • Fast Growing Local Property Tax Revenues. Proposition 98 is funded with a mixture of General Fund and local prop- erty tax revenues. We forecast local property taxes growing faster than the General Fund.
https://lao.ca.gov/handouts/Education/2003/Appropriations_Hearing_120203.pdf

^[PDF] Building Blocks of K-12 Education Budget

Building Blocks of K-12 Education Budget Building Blocks of K-12 Education Budget Legislative Analyst’s Office LAO Sources of Revenues for K-12 Total revenue assumed in 2002-03 budget as enacted is $55.4 billion Proposition 98—$41.6 billion (75 percent) • General Fund—$28.7 billion • Local property taxes—$13 billion Total other funds—$12.9 billion (25 percent) LAO Breakdown of
https://lao.ca.gov/handouts/Education/2003/Building_Blocks_of_K-12_Education_Budget.pdf

^[PDF] Child Care Budget for 2003-04 Without Realignment

Alternative 2: Approve $1,031 Million in New Taxes for Child Care Proposition 98 Outcomes • $1,395 million increase in the Proposition 98 minimum guarantee. This amount includes (1) $879 million from transferring child care programs back into Proposition 98 and (2) $516 million from new General Fund revenues required to go to K-14 education. • The $1,395 million increase is $364 million more than the $1,031 million in new revenue from increased taxes.
https://lao.ca.gov/handouts/Education/2003/Child_Care_Senate_042803.pdf

^[PDF] Analysis of the 2003-04 Budget Bill Overview of K-12 Education

(Our estimate assumes the Department of Finance forecast of local property taxes.) We recommend additional reductions in K-12 and community colleges to bring Proposition 98 funding down to our revised minimum guarantee. 2002-03 Budget Act $41,647.3 Deferrals -1,209.0 Ongoing cuts -155.1 One-Time cuts -290.5 Fund shifts -570.2 2002-03 Reviseda $39,422.5 Change From 2002-03 Budget Act -$2,224.9 Percent change -5.3% a Assumes SB 18x (Chesbro) as amended March 4, 2003.
https://lao.ca.gov/handouts/Education/2003/Overview_031003.pdf