Results


9,556 results

Sort by date / relevance

[PDF] 1950 Budget Analysis: CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL

The - 266 -- probable assignment, by location, of these lieutenants and the number of traffic officers presently assigned to these locations are as follows: Proposed No. of No. of traffic lieutenants to Existing Existing officers pres- Location be assigned captains sergeants ently assigned Amador County ___________ 1 - 3 Fresno County __________ ~_ n 1 4 38
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis/1950/11_highway_patrol_1950.pdf

[PDF] 1950 Budget Analysis: BOARD OF HARBOR COMMISSIONERS FOR HUMBOLDT BAY

., required for levee construction, or for construction of the Merced County or Fresno County stream group dams. It fulillis such other construction obligations as the State has assumed in its cooperative agreement with the Federal Government on the two river systems.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis/1950/29_reclamation_1950.pdf

[PDF] 1950 Budget Analysis: DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS

The latter is largely handled by means of contracts with recognized and qualified veterans' organizations, which maintain offices at veterans' facilities and contracts with counties for the maintenance of county service officers.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis/1950/33_veterans_1950.pdf

[PDF] 1950 Budget Analysis: LOCAL ASSISTANCE

County Veterans' Service Officers ITEM 499 of the Budget Bill Budget page 957 Budget line No. 17 For Contribution to Counties Toward the Compensation and Expenses of County Service Officers, From the General Fund Amount requested ______________________________________ $310,000 Estimated to be expended in 1949-50 Fiscal Year ____________ 310,000 Increase ________________________________________________ None
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis/1950/38_local_assistance_1950.pdf

[PDF] 1951 Budget Analysis: DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

During the current fiscal year probation rec- ords of 19 counties are scheduled for reporting. It is proposed to add 37 additional counties during the 1951-52 Fiscal Year. This program appears to, have real value to the administrators of the Youth Authority program:.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis/1951/14_doj_1951.pdf

[PDF] 1951 Budget Analysis: PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION

We recommend that the requested amount of $13,724 for support of the Public Utilities Commission from the Itinerant Merchants Fund be deleted and appropriate legislation be introduced transferring the admin- istration of this law to the Motor Transportation License Tax Division of the Board of Equalization.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis/1951/23_puc_1951.pdf

[PDF] 1951 Budget Analysis: AERONAUTICS COMMISSION

Where services are performed for cities or counties, reason- able reimbursement might be made from the unrefunded part of the Avia- tion Fuel Tax Fund. During the Fiscal Year 1949-50, $198,684 was paid to counties and $112,666 to cities from unrefunded aviation fuel tax.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis/1951/25_aeronautics_1951.pdf

[PDF] 1951 Budget Analysis: BUDGETARY CONTROL SECTIONS

This is true of its basic stru~ture and organization, its employees who are subject to state civil service to the same degree as any other group of state employees, of the tax rates paid by employers, and the scale of benefit payments made to unemployed workers.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis/1951/38_control_section_1951.pdf

[PDF] 1951 Budget Analysis: INDEX

Nelles School for Boys __________________________________________ . __ 114 Free Textbooks (Education) ______________ ---------------------~-_' _______ 501 Fresno State College ______________________________________ ~~--..:-:..:-:...-=_'-__ 161 Agriculture Department ________________________ .:. ______ .:. . .:..:. __ .:. ____ .:.,'-_ 16.2 Capital Outlay ________________________________________
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis/1951/39_index_1951.pdf

[PDF] 1952 Budget Analysis: Courts

This court handles appeals from the Superior Courts of Los Angeles, Ventura, San Luis Obispo and Santa Barbara Counties. There are nine justices assigned to this court. Approval of the amount requested is recommended.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis/1952/05_courts_1952.pdf