^[PDF] The 2013-14 Budget: Analysis of the Higher Education Budget

This cap also equates to about one extra year of coursework beyond that required for transfer or an associate degree. For CCC students who transfer to UC or CSU as juniors, the proposed cap is 150 percent in the first two years and 125 percent beginning in 2015‑16 of the additional units needed to meet the requirements for a bachelor’s degree.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis/2013/highered/higher-education-021213.pdf

^[PDF] LAO 1994 Budget Perspectives and Issues: State Fiscal Picture

(These estimates differ from those printed in the Governor's Figure 3 Governor's Budget General Fund Condition 1993-94 and 1994-95 (Dollars in Millions) 1993-94 As Proposeda Percent Change Adjusted for Restructuringb Prior-year balance -$2,289 -$1,893 -$1,893 Revenues and transfers 39,743 41,334 4.0% 43,105 8.5% Total resources avail- able $37,454 $39,441 $41,212 Expenditures
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_1994/1994_pandi/pi94part1.pdf

^[PDF] LAO 1994 Budget Analysis: Business & Labor Chapter

Specifically, we propose a transfer to cities and counties of all funds currently provided by the state for housing assistance. Local Housing and Community Development G - 31 governments would have broad flexibility to structure housing programs to meet the needs of their residents, provided the outcomes of the programs meet certain performance standards.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_1994/Business_and_labor_anl94.pdf

^[PDF] LAO 1994 Budget Analysis: K-12 Education Chapter

In addition, $38 million in federal block grant funds were transferred to the Department of Social Services (DSS) in 1991-92. Only $10 million of these funds have been spent. The funds were transferred to the DSS to pay for child care expenses of adults collecting Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) who worked or were participating in education or training.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_1994/K-12_Education_anl94.pdf

^[PDF] LAO 1994 Budget Analysis: State Administration Chapter

Elimination of eight revenue bond authorities, whose functions would be transferred to a new California Revenue Bond Financing Authority (CRBFA), which the budget proposes to establish (the budget proposes $687,000 and 16 positions for support of the CRBFA). !
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_1994/State_Administration_anl94.pdf

^[PDF] LAO 1994 Budget Analysis: Transportation Chapter

This is due to (a) continued reductions in revenues received from transportation taxes and fees, (b) the defeat of Proposition 156, (c) transfers of transportation funds for nonhighway or rail purposes, and (d) a lower-than anticipated amount of federal expenditure authority.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_1994/Transportation_anl94.pdf

^[PDF] LAO 1995 Budget Analysis: Capital Outlay Chapter

San Antonio College/Performing Arts Center 1,087 Pasadena Area CCD/Pasadena City College/Community Skills Center 1,810 San Francisco CCD/San Francisco City College/Library Building books 2,432 Sierra Joint CCD/Sierra College/Learning Resources Center 3,717 Sierra Joint CCD/Western Nevada County Center Buildings, Phase I 2,995 Ventura CCD/Moorpart
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_1995/Capital_Outlay_anl95.pdf

Analysis of the 1995-96 Budget Bill: Transportation Overview

In addition, the increase reflects the budget proposal to transfer the California S tate Police to the CHP, beginning July 1, 1995. For the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV), the budget proposes expenditures that are about 6.3 percent higher than in the current year.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_1995/chapa-ov.html

Analysis of the 1995-96 Budget Bill: Resources Departments #2

It promotes these objectives by (1) acquiring and consolidating subdivided land, (2) acquiring land for eventual sale or transfer to other pu blic agencies, (3) creating buffer zones surrounding federal and state park sites, (4) restoring natural resource areas, and (5) implementing programs to improve access from surrou nding inner city areas.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_1995/chapb-2.html

Analysis of the 1995-96 Budget Bill: Aid to Families With Dependent Children

The proposal increases county shares of cost in the social services programs and balances most of these increased costs with resources transferred to the counties from various funding sources. Specifically, the proposal would increase the counties' share of the nonfederal cost of AFDC (FG &U) grant payments from 5 percent to 50 percent and increase the counties' share of nonfederal AFDC-Foster Care payments from 60 percent to 100 percent.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_1995/chc5180.html