Analysis of the 1995-96 Budget Bill: Managed Care

County-Organized Health Systems (COHS). Under this approach, the county acts as a prepaid plan, serving all Medi-Cal beneficiaries in the county. The COHS receive a capitated rate for each beneficiary in the county, and assume full financial risk.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_1995/chc4260c.html

Analysis of the 1995-96 Budget Bill: University of California

Sharing by the state was justified on the basis that state tax dollars paid for much of the UC's physical plant an d personnel (especially faculty salaries); consequently, the state should share in the income derived from such an investment.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_1995/chf6440.html

Analysis of the 1995-96 Budget Bill: Case Management System

Establishing a share of cost for counties for additional changes to support county operations. Transfer of the wide area network (WAN) component from the vendor contract to the Health and Welfare Agency Data Center, and increased funding for the WAN.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_1995/chitcms.html

Analysis of the 1995-96 Budget Bill: SAWS Budget Proposal Incomplete

The DSS has proposed to base the SAWS on an aut omated welfare system developed in Napa County, called NAPAS. Los Angeles County, however, is authorized to implement its own automated welfare system, called LEADER.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_1995/chitsaws.html

Analysis of the 1995-96 Budget Bill: Major Expenditure Proposals in The 1995-96 Budget

This is defined as the 1986-87percentage of General Fund tax revenues provided to K-14 education (as adjusted by property tax shifts that have occurred in the 1990s). Test 2--Maintenance of Prior-Year Funding Levels.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_1995/part4-B.html

Analysis of the 1995-96 Budget Bill: What About California's Tax Levels?

Figures 13 and 14 show the level of California tax revenues under current and proposed law compared to average tax rev enue levels in other states (again, as of 1991-92). (We calculated the impact of the proposed tax cut by applying the fully phased-in percentage tax reduction to 1991-92 California tax levels.)
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_1995/pt5-a3.html

Analysis of the 1995-96 Budget Bill: The Governor's 1995-96 State-County Realignment Proposal

Increased Sales Tax Allocations. The proposal would increase allocations of state sales taxes to the counties. This would be accomplished by earmarking a portion (.2215 cent) of the state's sales tax to pay for t he increased county costs of the foster care, CWS, adoptions, and child abuse prevention programs.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_1995/pt5-b.html

^[PDF] LAO 1995 Budget Analysis: Transportation Chapter

Because CHP has offices in all counties (except Alpine), it could provide much broader coverage to state employees and facilities by including that coverage as part of a CHP officer's regular patrol responsibility.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_1995/transportation_anl95.pdf

^[PDF] LAO 1996 Budget Analysis: Transportation Chapter

For instance, from 1985 to 1995, Santa Clara County generated about $900 million for state highway improvements. Currently, 17 counties impose at least a ½ cent local sales tax for local transportation purposes.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_1996/a96a.pdf

1996-97 Budget Analysis: Resources, Part II

To compensate the landowners for the restricted use of their property, the property is assessed at less than market value for property tax purpos es. In turn, the state compensates the counties for the loss of property tax revenues by providing counties with General Fund subvention payments.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_1996/a96b2.html