^[PDF] Do Communities Adequately Plan for Housing?

State law generally requires cities and counties to update their housing elements every eight years. The fourth housing element planning cycle, which began sometime between 2006 and 2008 for most cities and counties, recently ended.
https://lao.ca.gov/reports/2017/3605/plan-for-housing-030817.pdf

^[PDF] Over of the 2017 Transportation Funding Package

To be eligible to receive SB 1 funding for streets and roads maintenance and rehabilitation, the legislation requires cities and counties to spend at least as much on transportation from their unrestricted funds as they spent from 2009-10 through 2011-12, on average.
https://lao.ca.gov/reports/2017/3688/2017-transportation-package-060817.pdf

Cracks in the Local Fiscal Foundation

13: Property Tax Allocation 14: Property Tax Allocation 15: (Untitled) 16: Summary of Local Fiscal Control 17: Second Crack: Not Conducive to Broad Economic Growth 18: Instead, Local Fiscal System Encourages Cities and Counties to 19: What Fiscal Incentive Do Cities Face?
https://lao.ca.gov/sections/local_govt/cracks_presentation/fslide1.html

Strengths of Local Fiscal Foundation

13: Property Tax Allocation 14: Property Tax Allocation 15: (Untitled) 16: Summary of Local Fiscal Control 17: Second Crack: Not Conducive to Broad Economic Growth 18: Instead, Local Fiscal System Encourages Cities and Counties to 19: What Fiscal Incentive Do Cities Face?
https://lao.ca.gov/sections/local_govt/cracks_presentation/fslide8.html

^[PDF] The 2022-23 Budget: Fuel Price and Other Fiscal Relief Options

In contrast, if the Legislature’s goal is to provide relief to those experiencing the greatest financial hardship, it may want to consider options beyond those linked to fuel taxes and vehicle ownership.
https://lao.ca.gov/reports/2022/4597/Fuel-Price-Fiscal-Relief-Options-051222.pdf

^[PDF] The 2019-20 Budget: Natural Resources and Environmental Protection

The 2019-20 Budget: Natural Resources and Environmental Protection
https://lao.ca.gov/reports/2019/3933/natural-resources-environmental-protection-021419.pdf

Review of The Orange County Recovery Plan as Proposed August 22, 1995

The pool consisted of funds from Orange County as well as approximately 240 other local agencies, including school districts, cities, and special districts. A significant share of the pool consisted of proceeds of debt issuances by the County and other agencies, some of which were made for the purpose of investing in the pool.
https://lao.ca.gov/1995/090195_orange_county/orange.html

Overview of the 1996-97 Governor's Budget

About one-half of this difference is due to the Governor's revenue proposals and a variety of other administrative assumptions, regarding such factors as transfers from special funds and revenue accruals.
https://lao.ca.gov/1996/011896_bud_overview/pb11896.html

Overview of the 1997-98 May Revision

The May Revision proposes to return $100 million of the approximately $3.4 billion in property taxes that were transferred from counties, cities, and special districts to schools as part of previous budget agreements.
https://lao.ca.gov/1997/051997_may_revision/pb051997_may_revision.html

^[PDF] An LAO Report Sheltering the Homeless: Alternatives to the Armories

Both the City of San Jose and Santa Clara County contributed significant funding. In addition, other local cities agreed to pay a share of costs based on the number of their residents using the facility.
https://lao.ca.gov/1997/120397_homeless/120397_armory.pdf