LAO 2005 Budget Analysis: Tax Relief (9100)

Because of the availability of these alternative sources of data, Chapter  39's requirement that county auditors prepare annual tax disbursement reports for redevelopment agencies has become redundant.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_2005/general_govt/gen_17_9100.htm

^[PDF] LAO 2005-06 Budget Analysis: Health and Social Services Chapter

Such reimbursements are intended to help provide financial stability for the county-based indigent care programs that are currently in place. We are advised that, at this time, neither LA County nor DHS are seeking a separate waiver that would provide financial assistance solely to LA County.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_2005/health_ss/healthss_anl05.pdf

Eighth Annual LAO Analysis Quiz

(A) The more tax auditors the state hires, the greater the state budget deficit will become. (B) As more road accidents occur, CHP officers are spending more time responding to accidents instead of on activities to prevent them.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_2005/quiz/analysis_quiz_041405.htm

LAO 2005 Budget Analysis: Department of Fish and Game (3600)

This fund receives revenues from hunting and fishing licenses and taxes, commercial fishing permits and fees, and environmental revie w fees paid by project proponents. Statute provides that many of these revenues can be used to support a broad range of programs related to hunting and fishing, as well as fish and wildlife protection and management activities.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_2005/resources/res_10_3600_anl05.htm

^[PDF] LAO 2005-06 Budget Analysis: Resources Chapter

In February of that year, a 150 foot gap opened in the levee, allowing approxi- mately 20,000 acre feet of water to flood 7,000 acres of land in the commu- nities of Linda and Olivehurst, in Yuba County.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_2005/resources/resource_anl05.pdf

LAO 2005 Budget Analysis: Transportation Funding Instability Continues

Specifically, our recommendation is to repeal Propo sition  42, replace it with an increase in the gas tax, and adjust the gas tax for inflation. These actions would provide about the same amount of money to transportation as Proposition  42 while freeing up General Fund revenues for nontransportation purposes.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_2005/transportation/tran_02_cc_trans_funding_anl05.htm

LAO 2006 Budget Perspectives and Issues: Perspectives on State Revenues

This is a uniform local tax rate of 1.25 percent levied by all counties (the so-called Bradley-Burns rate). Of this total, 0.25 percent is deposited into county transportation funds, while the remaining 1 percent is allocated to city and county governments for their general purposes.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_2006/2006_pandi/pi_03_anl06.html

LAO 2006 Budget Perspectives and Issues: Major Expenditure Proposals In the 2006-07 Budget

By shifting property taxes to local government, the state met the Proposition 98 minimum guarantee by increasing General Fund spending to backfil l the reallocated property tax revenues. These transfers total $6.8 billion in 2006-07.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_2006/2006_pandi/pi_05_anl06.html

LAO 2006 Budget Analysis: Governor’s Strategic Growth Plan

The remaining 27 percent of funding ($59 billion) would come from new sources, such as revenue bonds backed by gas tax and weight fee revenues, private investments in transportation facilities, and fees to be charged on water users.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_2006/cap_outlay/co_02_anl06.html

LAO 2006 Budget Analysis: Judicial Branch (0250)

Additionally, counties could make incre mental payments to the escrow account. Calculation of the County Facilities Payment The current method of calculating county facility payments (CFPs) is cumbersome and onerous to some counties, as well as biased against counties with active maintenance programs.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_2006/cap_outlay/co_03_0250_anl06.html