^[PDF] The 1983-84 Budget: Perspectives and Issues

The estimates in Table 44 assume that the yield paid on future tax-exempt bond issues will be 10 percent. The actual yields, however, will depend on the course of future federal monetary and fiscal policies, on the market for municipal debt specifically, and on the path of the economy generally.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis/1983/pandi_83_part2-3.pdf

^[PDF] The 2012-13 Budget: Refocusing CDCR After The 2011 Realignment

To finance the new responsibilities shifted to local governments, the 2011 realignment plan reallocated state sales tax and state and local vehicle license fee revenues to counties. (Please see our recent report, The 2012-13 Budget: The 2011 Realignment of Adult Offenders— An Update, for a more detailed description of the overall 2011 realignment plan.)
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis/2012/crim_justice/cdcr-022312.pdf

^[PDF] LAO 1995 Budget Analysis: OPTIONS FOR BALANCE THE 1995-96 BUDGET

We also have included several actions on the list that would in- crease state revenues by reducing or eliminating certain “tax ex- penditures.” ! Identify Actions That Benefit The General Fund. The actions we have identified result in General Fund savings in order to address the budget gap.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_1995/pi95_part6.pdf

1996-97 Budget Analysis: K-12 Education Overview

Our recommendations for Proposition 98 spending in the budget year are based on the level of General Fund revenues projected by (1) the Governor's Budget, (2) the LAO forecast ass uming enactment of the tax cut, and (3) the LAO forecast assuming no tax cut.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_1996/a96eov.html

^[PDF] LAO 1997 Budget Analysis: K-12 Education Chapter

https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_1997/k12_ed_anal97.pdf

1998-99 Perspectives and Issues: State Fiscal Picture

The budget does not contain any new tax-related proposals. However, the revenue forecast does incorporate the effects of the state's 1997 tax relief package, including an increased personal income tax dependent exemption credit.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_1998/p_and_i_1998/part_1_fiscal_picture1_pandi98.html

2000 Budget Analysis: CJ OCJP 8100

In addition, California DARE programs currently receive financia l support from several sources, including the proceeds of voluntary donations on state tax forms and other OCJP drug suppression programs.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_2000/crim_justice/cj_12_OCJP_8100_anl00.htm

2000 Budget Analysis: H&SS; EDD 5100

In addition, the department collects taxes and pays benefits under the UI and DI Programs. The department collects from employers (1) their UI contributions, (2) the Employment Tra ining Tax, and (3) employee contributions for DI.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_2000/health_ss/hss_14_EDD_5100_anl00.htm

2000 Budget Analysis: H&SS; Overview

In 1991-92, realignment legislation shifted $2 billion of health and social services program costs from the General Fund to the Local Revenue Fund, which is funded through state sa les taxes and vehicle license fees.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_2000/health_ss/hss_1_ov_anl00.htm

^[PDF] Highlights of the 2000-01 Analysis and P & I

(Analysis, page A-20.) n The budget proposes “use-it-or-lose-it” provisions for two types of local transportation funds—federal transportation funds and gas tax revenues. We conclude that the proposals are unwarranted and recommend against them.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_2000/highlights_00-01_analysis.pdf