Results for snohomish county lodging tax


9,312 results

Sort by date / relevance

[PDF] The California Deficit Prevention Act (version 2)

This measure requires that a tax measure be subject to the two-thirds vote requirement if it results in a tax increase for any individual taxpayer—regardless of whether it raises or lowers aggregate taxes.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2005/050037.pdf

2005 Initiative Analysis: The California Deficit Prevention Act (version 3)

This measure requires that a tax measure be subject to the two-thirds vote requirement if it results in a tax increase for any individual taxpayer—regardless of whether it raises or lowers aggregate taxes.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2005/050038.htm

2005 Initiative Analysis: The California Deficit Prevention Act (version 4)

This measure requires that a tax measure be subject to the two-thirds vote requirement if it results in a tax increase for any individual taxpayer—regardless of whether it raises or lowers aggregate taxes.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2005/050039.htm

[PDF] The California Deficit Prevention Act (version 4)

This measure requires that a tax measure be subject to the two-thirds vote requirement if it results in a tax increase for any individual taxpayer—regardless of whether it raises or lowers aggregate taxes.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2005/050039.pdf

2005 Initiative Analysis: The California Deficit Prevention Act (version 5)

This measure requires that a tax measure be subject to the two-thirds vote requirement if it results in a tax increase for any individual taxpayer—regardless of whether it raises or lowers aggregate taxes.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2005/050040.htm

2005 Initiative Analysis: Redistricting Reform: The Voter Empowerment Act

Because the measure requires the redistricting plans to be approved by voters, it would result in costs to the state and counties each time a plan was placed on the ballot. These c osts primarily would be related to preparing and mailing election-related materials.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2005/050048.htm

2005 Initiative Analysis: More Money for the Kids Act

Requires county office reviews of school district finances to include a review of operating expenses by program or service and a review of whether district budgets spend th e required proportion of funds on classroom instruction.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2005/050049.htm

[PDF] More Money for the Kids Act

Requires county office reviews of school district finances to include a review of operating expenses by program or service and a review of whether district budgets spend the required proportion of funds on classroom instruction.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2005/050049.pdf

2005 Initiative Analysis: Fairness for Public Charter Schools Act

Background Existing charter school law authorizes school districts and, under certain conditions, county offices of education and the State Board of Education to charter schools. The original charter is valid for five years, at which time the school must have its charter renewed.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2005/050050.htm

[PDF] The Education Funding Protection Act

Background Article XIIIB of the State Constitution places annual limits on the appropriations of tax proceeds that can be made by the state, school districts, and local governments in California. The annual spending limit for each jurisdiction is based on the amount of appropriations in 1978-79 (the base year), as adjusted each year for population growth and cost-of-living factors.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2005/050052.pdf