2005 Initiative Analysis: California Fair Minimum Wage Initiative (version 2). (Amendment #1-S)

Spe cifically: To the extent that higher wage costs reduced business profits, personal income taxes and corporate tax receipts would decline. This is significant because the average income ta x rate on foregone business profits would generally be higher than the personal income tax rate on minimum wage employees’ wage increases.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2005/050843.htm

^[PDF] Tobacco Tax, Disease Prevention and Children's Health Insurance Act of 2006 (version 2)

BACKGROUND Tobacco Taxes Existing Tax Rate. Current state law imposes excise taxes on cigarettes and other tobacco products. The state’s cigarette tax is currently 87 cents per pack (with an equivalent tax on other types of tobacco products) and is levied on cigarette distributors who supply cigarettes to retail stores.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2005/050849.pdf

^[PDF] The Clean Alternative Energy Act (version 1), Amendment #2-S

Proposal Severance Tax on Oil Production in California. Beginning in January 2007, the measure would impose a severance tax on oil production in California. (The term severance tax is commonly used to describe a tax on the production of any mineral or product taken from the ground, including oil.)
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2005/050987.pdf

^[PDF] Fair Medical Treatment for Workers Act (Amendment #1-S)

Increased costs may reduce business profitability, thereby decreasing income tax revenues. Partially offsetting this decrease could be a gain in the gross premiums tax paid by insurance companies. The net effect of these impacts is not possible to estimate.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2007/070098.pdf

^[PDF] Pothole Repair Funded by Online Poker (Amendment #2-S)

The state and local gov- ernments would experience a loss of other tax revenues (such as sales tax revenues from reduced purchases) and gambling-related revenues (such as revenues generated from the California Lottery, card rooms, horse racing establishments, and tribal casinos).
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2007/070471.pdf

^[PDF] California Energy Independence and Zero Carbon Dioxide Emission Electical Generation Act of 2008

These, in turn, would poten- tially increase state and local revenues through increased personal income, corporation, sales, and property taxes. In addition, these factors could directly reduce costs incurred by the state and local governments for their own operations.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2007/070632.pdf

^[PDF] The Compassionate and Sensible Access Act

State and local governments currently collect sales tax on medicinal marijuana sales. A small number of cities also impose a supplemental tax on medical marijuana sales. We estimate that the total amount of state and local revenue collected statewide from medical marijuana sales and supplemental taxes likely is in the high tens of millions of dollars annually.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2015/150247.pdf

^[PDF] Related to the cultivation, use, possession, and sale of marijuana. Amendment #1

In addition, the measure authorizes local governments to place additional taxes on medical or recreational marijuana sales if the taxes meet certain requirements. For example, local general purpose taxes on marijuana must be approved by two-thirds of the local governing body and a majority vote of the electorate.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2015/150457.pdf

^[PDF] InitiativAmend the Constitution to allow and facilitate future, but unknown, legislative actions that could substantially increase state healthcare spending and associated tax revenues.e Letter

The above constitutional changes would allow and facilitate potentially large increases in new tax revenues dedicated to healthcare spending. Potential Redirection of Existing Tax Revenues. In addition to new taxes, the measure’s provisions would apply to the redirection of existing state tax revenues to the HCTF.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2017/170547.pdf

^[PDF] Cash Management Revised 06 17 08

Although this means some opportunities exist for evening out disbursements, we have concerns with deferring additional payments in the fi rst half of the June 17, 2008 Page 2 fi scal year—prior to districts receiving their fi rst property tax allocations.
https://lao.ca.gov/handouts/Conf_Comm/2008/Cash_Management_06_12_08.pdf