Results


9,553 results

Sort by date / relevance

2005 Initiative Analysis: Voters' Right to Protect Marriage Initiative (version 2)

(The law af fects matters such as the receipt of federal benefits and federal taxes.) State Laws. The State Constitution currently does not define marriage. Under current California statute, only marriage between a man and a woman is valid and recognized.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2005/050810.htm

[PDF] Voters' Right to Protect Marriage Initiative (version 3)

(The law affects matters such as the receipt of federal benefits and federal taxes.) State Laws. The State Constitution currently does not define marriage. Under current California statute, only marriage between a man and a woman is valid and recognized.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2005/050810.pdf

[PDF] Voters' Right to Protect Marriage Initiative (version 4)

(The law affects matters such as the receipt of federal benefits and federal taxes.) State Laws. The State Constitution currently does not define marriage. Under current California statute, only marriage between a man and a woman is valid and recognized.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2005/050819.pdf

[PDF] Voters' Right to Protect Marriage Initiative (version 5)

(The law affects matters such as the receipt of federal benefits and federal taxes.) State Laws. The State Constitution currently does not define marriage. Under current California statute, only marriage between a man and a woman is valid and recognized.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2005/050833.pdf

2005 Initiative Analysis: Voters' Right to Protect Marriage Initiative (version 6)

(The law af fects matters such as the receipt of federal benefits and federal taxes.) State Laws. The State Constitution currently does not define marriage. Under current California statute, only marriage between a man and a woman is valid and recognized.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2005/050840.htm

[PDF] Voters' Right to Protect Marriage Initiative (version 6)

(The law affects matters such as the receipt of federal benefits and federal taxes.) State Laws. The State Constitution currently does not define marriage. Under current California statute, only marriage between a man and a woman is valid and recognized.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2005/050840.pdf

2005 Initiative Analysis: California Fair Minimum Wage Initiative (version 1). (Amendment #1-S)

Counties would face initial costs of about $5  million, rising to $10  million in 2008 ‑09 and thereafter. Medi-Cal Hospital Costs. Higher costs for hospital care paid through Medi-Cal would be unknown but significant.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2005/050842.htm

[PDF] California Fair Minimum Wage Initiative (version 1). (Amendment #1-S)

Counties would face initial costs of about $5 million, rising to $10 million in 2008-09 and thereafter. • Medi-Cal Hospital Costs. Higher costs for hospital care paid through Medi- Cal would be unknown but significant. • Child Care Programs.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2005/050842.pdf

[PDF] California Fair Minimum Wage Initiative (version 2). (Amendment #1-S)

Counties would face initial costs of about $5 million, rising to $10 million in 2008-09 and thereafter. • Medi-Cal Hospital Costs. Higher costs for hospital care paid through Medi- Cal would be unknown but significant. • Child Care Programs.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2005/050843.pdf

2005 Initiative Analysis: California Fair Minimum Wage Initiative (version 3). (Amendment #1-S)

Counties would face initial costs of about $5  million, rising to $25  million in 2009 ‑10 and thereafter. Medi-Cal Costs. Higher costs for hospital care paid through Medi-Cal would be unknown but significant.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2005/050844.htm