2005 Initiative Analysis: Sexual Predator Punishment and Control Act: Jessica’s Law

Counties would be reimbursed in full for all of these costs after t hey had filed and processed claims with the state. Finally, the provisions in this measure allowing for the indeterminate commitment of SVPs instead of the current two-year recommitment process could reduce county costs for SVP c ommitment proceedings and the claims that counties would file with the state for reimbursement of such costs.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2005/050731.htm

^[PDF] Sexual Predator Punishment and Control Act: Jessica’s Law

Counties would be reimbursed in full for all of these costs after they had filed and processed claims with the state. Finally, the provisions in this measure allowing for the indeterminate commitment of SVPs instead of the current two-year recommitment process could reduce county costs for SVP commitment proceedings and the claims that counties would file with the state for reimbursement of such costs.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2005/050731.pdf

^[PDF] California Marriage Protection Act

For the receipt of federal benefits or for federal tax purposes, current federal law only recognizes marriage between a man and a woman. State Laws. The State Constitution currently does not define marriage.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2005/050732.pdf

2005 Initiative Analysis: Taxation Elimination Medical Compensation, Uninsured Healthcare Coverage, Healthcare Cost Reduction. (Amendment #1-S)

The net effect of the measure on state and county expenditures is unknown. Specifically, this measure would reduce state and county costs for health care services to the extent that additional patients who would otherwise receive state or local health a ssistance instead received their medical services from health care providers eligible for the tax deductions and exemptions proposed by this measure.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2005/050755.htm

^[PDF] "Hippocratic Oath­­--Taxation Elimination Medical Compensation, Uninsured Healthcare Coverage, Healthcare Cost Reduction"

The net effect of the measure on state and county expenditures is unknown. Specifically, this measure would reduce state and county costs for health care services to the extent that additional patients who would otherwise receive state or local health assistance instead received their medical services from health care providers eligible for the tax deductions and exemptions proposed by this measure.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2005/050755.pdf

2005 Initiative Analysis: The McCauley-Rooker Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act

Annual increased state taxes—primarily from increased personal income taxes—in the low tens of billions of dollars annually, offset by a commensurate amount of state tax reduct ions from rate reductions and new tax credits.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2005/050762.htm

2005 Initiative Analysis: The Emergency Services and Tobacco Tax Act of 2006

Some of the additional cigarette tax revenues would be passed through to local government agencies, such as counties that operate hospitals (which could receive funding for eme rgency services) and counties that received allocations to reimburse physicians for uncompensated care for indigents.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2005/050775.htm

^[PDF] The Emergency Services and Tobacco Tax Act of 2006

Some of the additional cigarette tax revenues would be passed through to local government agencies, such as counties that operate hospitals (which could receive funding for emergency services) and counties that received allocations to reimburse physicians for uncompensated care for indigents.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2005/050775.pdf

2005 Initiative Analysis: Tobacco Tax and Disease Prevention Act of 2006

Background Tobacco Taxes Existing Tax Rate. Current state law imposes excise taxes on cigarettes and other tobacco products. The state’s cigarette tax is currently 87 cents per pack (with an equivalent tax on other types of tobacco products) and is levied on cigarette distributors, who supply cigarettes to retail stores.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2005/050782.htm

^[PDF] Tobacco Tax and Disease Prevention Act of 2006

BACKGROUND Tobacco Taxes Existing Tax Rate. Current state law imposes excise taxes on cigarettes and other tobacco products. The state’s cigarette tax is currently 87 cents per pack (with an equivalent tax on other types of tobacco products) and is levied on cigarette distributors, who supply cigarettes to retail stores.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2005/050782.pdf