^[PDF] A Review of the Orange County Recovery Plan as Proposed August 22, 1995

In exchange, the County will transfer $23 million per year in gas tax revenues to the OCT A. This proposal will result in a net reduction in OCTA funding of $38 million in 1996-97 and $15 million annually thereafter through 2010-11.
https://lao.ca.gov/reports/1995/a_review_of_the_orange_county_recovery_plan_as_proposed_8-22-1995.pdf

^[PDF] Improving Higher Education Oversight

Shortly before its closure, CPEC transferred its database servers to the CCC Chancellor’s Office. (The administration, however, did not transfer the associated funding and personnel.) Under federal privacy laws, each segment is permitted access only to its own student data and should not have access to individually identified student records from other segments.
https://lao.ca.gov/reports/2012/edu/ihe/improving-higher-education-010612.pdf

^[PDF] Supplemental Report of the 2012-13 Budget Package

The proposed amendment is primarily focused on three elements of the operating agreement: i) Rent to the department from the Morro Bay SP Golf Course; and ii) Transfer ownership of a portion of Pecho Valley Road from County to department to facilitate the collection of day use fees at Montana de Oro SP. iii) Extension of the operating agreement for an additional
https://lao.ca.gov/reports/2012/supp_report/supp_report_2012_052013.pdf

^[PDF] A Required Report on the Implementation of the Working Families Student Fee Transparency and Accountability Act

[Education Code Section 66201] State law affirms this commitment specifically with regard to providing “…adequate resources to support enrollment growth…” and that the annual state budget act contain appropriations necessary to accommodate all California residents who are continuing undergraduate students or eligible for admission as freshmen or sophomores or transfers from community colleges.
https://lao.ca.gov/reports/2014/education/student-fee/Fee-Transparency-Accountability-Act-032114.pdf

^[PDF] Addressing California's Key Liabilities

Proposition 42 (2002) required the state to transfer revenue from the sales tax on gasoline to the TIF. The state was allowed to suspend these transfers and use the funds for other budgetary purposes.
https://lao.ca.gov/reports/2014/finance/liabilities/addressing-california-key-liabilities-050714.pdf

^[PDF] Property Tax Reductions to Diminish as Housing Market Improves

About $50 billion in property taxes each year is collected and distributed to local governments—including counties, cities, school and community college districts (schools), and special districts. Figure 1 shows how property tax revenues were distributed statewide to these governments in 2012-13.
https://lao.ca.gov/reports/2014/finance/property-tax/property-tax-050514.pdf

^[PDF] The 2016-17 Budget: The State’s Drought Response

These federal agencies also have expedited review and permitting processes to facilitate drought response initiatives such as transferring water among users and trucking hatchery-raised fish for downstream release.
https://lao.ca.gov/reports/2016/3343/drought-response-020516.pdf

^[PDF] The 2016-17 Budget: Analysis of the Department of Developmental Services Budget

As the payer of last resort, RCs generally only pay for services if an individual does not have private health insurance or if the RC cannot refer an individual to so-called “generic” services such as (1) other state-administered health and human services programs for low-income persons or (2) services that are generally provided at the local level by counties, cities, school districts, or other agencies.
https://lao.ca.gov/reports/2016/3382/developmental-services-analysis-030416.pdf

^[PDF] Rethinking the 1991 Realignment

Prior to Proposition 13, each local government—cities, counties, and special districts—could set its property tax rate annually. The average rate before Proposition 13 passed was 2.67 percent. This average rate reflected the sum of individual levies of multiple local governments serving a property (including schools).
https://lao.ca.gov/reports/2018/3886/1991-realignment-101518.pdf

Local Fiscal Control Spawns Greater Accountability

13: Property Tax Allocation 14: Property Tax Allocation 15: (Untitled) 16: Summary of Local Fiscal Control 17: Second Crack: Not Conducive to Broad Economic Growth 18: Instead, Local Fiscal System Encourages Cities and Counties to 19: What Fiscal Incentive Do Cities Face?
https://lao.ca.gov/sections/local_govt/cracks_presentation/fslide11.html