Property Tax

13: Property Tax Allocation 14: Property Tax Allocation 15: (Untitled) 16: Summary of Local Fiscal Control 17: Second Crack: Not Conducive to Broad Economic Growth 18: Instead, Local Fiscal System Encourages Cities and Counties to 19: What Fiscal Incentive Do Cities Face?
https://lao.ca.gov/sections/local_govt/cracks_presentation/fslide5.html

Sales Tax

13: Property Tax Allocation 14: Property Tax Allocation 15: (Untitled) 16: Summary of Local Fiscal Control 17: Second Crack: Not Conducive to Broad Economic Growth 18: Instead, Local Fiscal System Encourages Cities and Counties to 19: What Fiscal Incentive Do Cities Face?
https://lao.ca.gov/sections/local_govt/cracks_presentation/fslide6.html

^[PDF] Proposition 99: An Update

i In November 1988, the voters approved Proposition 99, the Tobacco Tax and Health Protection Act, which established a surtax of 25 cents per package on cigarettes and an equivalent amount on all other tobacco products sold in California.
https://lao.ca.gov/1990/reports/347_0290_prop_99_update.pdf

^[PDF] Health Care in Rural California

Generally, this gap is made up with nonpatient revenue such as district tax revenue (for district hospitals), private contribu- tions, and county contributions (for county hospitals). Over time, operating shortfalls mean that the hospitals are unable to main- tain the physical plant, replace equipment, and make other capital improvements.
https://lao.ca.gov/1990/reports/502_0290_health_care_in_rural_california.pdf

^[PDF] Overview of the Governor's Budget 1993-94

As incomes fall, the state’s progressive tax structure takes a smaller share of income in taxes. When economic recovery occurs and raises incomes, on the other hand, the tax burden will tend to rebound to former levels because of this progressive tax structure.
https://lao.ca.gov/1993/Overview_Gov_Budget_170_0193.pdf

^[PDF] Overview of the May Revision 1993-94

The most problematic part of the budget plan is the proposed $2.6 billion property tax shift from local governments to schools. The Adminis- tration proposes that the counties offset a portion of their $2.1 billion loss by increasing local sales taxes, obtaining relief from state-mandated programs requirements, and using transferred special district property tax revenues.
https://lao.ca.gov/1993/Overview_May_Revision_176_0593.pdf

THE PRESIDENT'S WELFARE REFORM PROPOSAL:

This change, in conjunction with the fact that nonsubsidized jobs generally will provide more income to recipients than will WORK slots (due largely to differences in how the income disregard discussed below and the Earned Income Tax Credit are treated), could lead to a significant increase in the incentive for recipients to obtain nonsubsidized jobs.
https://lao.ca.gov/1994/clinwelf.htm

Redevelopment After Reform: A Preliminary Look

(We note, however, that no monies from the fund may be spent without the agreement of the County--and that a ny excess money at the end of the redevelopment project reverts to the County. Thus, all the excess tax increment money is effectively controlled by the County.)
https://lao.ca.gov/1994/redevelopment_after_reform.html

October 1995 Cal Update

Cities and Counties Relying upon earlier Court of Appeal opinions on Proposition 62, many California cities and counties imposed general taxes in recent years without submitting the tax to a vote of t he electorate.
https://lao.ca.gov/1995/cal_update/cup1095.html

1995 September California Update

Figure 2 summarizes the major fiscal effects of the proposals on state/county funds. The net effect on state/county funds depends on several variables, the most significant being: Whether the state chooses to backfill for lost federal fund in order to maintain current service levels.
https://lao.ca.gov/1995/cal_update/cup995.html