^[PDF] California's Tax Expenditure Programs--Part 1: Overview

California's Tax Expenditure Programs--Part 1: Overview • • were developed by the state's two major tax agencies-the California Franchise Tax Board (FTB), for in- come taxes, and the State Board of Equalization (BOE), for all other taxes.
https://lao.ca.gov/reports/1999/californias_tax_expenditure_program_part_1.pdf

^[PDF] MOU Fiscal Analysis: Bargaining Units 1, 3, 4, 11, 14, 15, 17, 20, and 21 (SEIU Local 1000) Revised

The MOUs provide the approximately 1,300 seasonal clerks employed by the Franchise Tax Board and the State Compensation Insurance Fund with a 50 cent per hour pay raise effective July 1, 2013. These clerks currently have a base salary of $1,418 to $1,620 per month, meaning the change represents between a 5 percent and 6 percent increase.  California Department of Corrections and Rehabiliation (CDCR) Unit 3 Employees.
https://lao.ca.gov/reports/2010/MOU_Fiscal/MOU_Analysis_12222010_revised.pdf

^[PDF] Major Features of California's 2010-11 Budget

The budget reflects about $187 million in savings in the Medi-Cal Program from the phase-in of mandatory enrollment of certain seniors and persons with disabilities into managed care in some counties.
https://lao.ca.gov/reports/2010/bud/major_features/major_features_101210.pdf

^[PDF] The 2010-11 Budget: Assessing the Prison Population Reduction Proposal

Currently, roughly half of all county jails in the state are under court‑ordered or self‑imposed population caps—resulting in many counties releasing certain inmates early due to lack of jail space. Thus, most county jails would not be able to house the additional offenders that they would be required to supervise under the Gov‑ ernor’s proposal.
https://lao.ca.gov/reports/2010/crim/prison_pop/prison_pop_012510.pdf

^[PDF] One motivation for the court case involving education mandates

One motivation for the court case involving education mandates was that other local government (cities, counties, and special districts) mandates are already funded on an annual ongoing basis. Under Proposition 1A, approved by the state’s voters in 2004, the Legis‑ lature has only three options for addressing other local government mandates: (1) appropriate funds in the annual
https://lao.ca.gov/reports/2010/edu/educ_mandates/ed_mandates_020210.pdf

^[PDF] Prisons vs. Universities Proposal Would Unwisely Lock Up Budget Flexibility

(“Other resources” include existing General Fund support going to other state departments and/or new tax revenues.) recommend rejection of ProPoSal We share the Governor’s desire to find ways to reduce costs in the state’s correctional system.
https://lao.ca.gov/reports/2010/edu/educ_prisons/educ_prisons_012610.pdf

^[PDF] Year_one Survey: Update on School District Finance and Flexibility

L e g i s L a t i v e a n a L y s t ’ s O f f i c e a n L a O R e p O R t 7 K-12 Categorical Programs Excluded From Flexibility Item (In Millions) Program 2009-10 Funding Special education $3,150 K-3 Class Size Reduction 1,485 Economic Impact Aid 1,008 After School Safety and Education 547 Home-to-School Transportation 496 Quality Education Investment Act 355 Child nutrition 134 Student
https://lao.ca.gov/reports/2010/edu/educ_survey/educ_survey_050410.pdf

^[PDF] The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act: An Overview of Its Potential Impact on State Health Programs

. ➢ Federal Tax Changes and State Revenue Impacts. The PPACA imposes various taxes and penalties that may have an impact on businesses and individuals. These changes, as well as the expansion of health coverage could have significant implications for the state tax system and revenues.
https://lao.ca.gov/reports/2010/hlth/fed_healthcare/fed_healthcare_051310.pdf

^[PDF] Maximizing Federal Funds for HIV/AIDS: Improving Surveillance and Reporting

This report should specify what actions are being taken to ensure that the state is leveraging data on persons receiving state‑supported HIV‑related services to improve the surveillance database, and report what progress is being made on a county‑by‑county basis and statewide.
https://lao.ca.gov/reports/2010/hlth/hiv_reporting/hiv_reporting_022210.pdf

^[PDF] Liquid Assets: Improving Management of the State's Groundwater Resources

L e g i s L a t i v e a n a L y s t ’ s O f f i c e a n L a O R e p O R t 21 Orange COunty Water DistriCt: a LOng-term apprOaCh tO grOunDWater management Following a precipitous drop in groundwater levels in some areas of the Orange County groundwater basin, the Orange County Water District was formed in 1933 by an act of the Leg- islature to
https://lao.ca.gov/reports/2010/rsrc/groundwater/groundwater_032410.pdf