^[PDF] Part v—majOr issues facing the LegisLature Governor’s

Part v—majOr issues facing the LegisLature Governor’s Tax Proposals Make Sense  The Governor is proposing to permanently eliminate the existing teacher retention tax credit, which was adopted in 2000 but was suspended in four of the past six years.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_2007/highlights/analysis_highlights_022107.pdf

^[PDF] California Budget Deficit Prevention Act

This measure amends the Constitution to delete the provisions that require the state to (1) reimburse cities, counties, and special districts for transfers of financial responsibility for certain programs and (2) annually fund or suspend most mandates.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2004/040635.pdf

^[PDF] California Petroleum Commission

To the extent that this occurs, there would be state and local revenue losses due to reduced revenue from corporate and personal income taxes, property taxes, and gasoline excise taxes. Alternatively, if the rate-setting mechanism reduces wholesale petroleum prices, without reducing production and investment, consumers in the state could benefit in the form of lower retail prices.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2004/040707.pdf

^[PDF] The California Fair Voting and Equal Representation Act (version 4)

Among these requirements are: (1) for state offices, population differences among districts cannot exceed 2 percent; (2) the plan must not dilute the voting strength of minorities; and (3) the plan must minimize the splitting of counties and cities into multiple districts.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2005/050019.pdf

^[PDF] The California Deficit Prevention Act (version 1)

This measure requires that a tax measure be subject to the two-thirds vote requirement if it results in a tax increase for any individual taxpayer—regardless of whether it raises or lowers aggregate taxes.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2005/050036.pdf

^[PDF] The Education Funding Protection Act

The constitutional requirements regarding imposition of these levies involve lower approval thresholds by the governing body and/or voters than is the case for taxes. For example, regulatory fees are subject to approval by (1) a majority vote of the Legislature (instead of a two-thirds vote that would be required for a state tax) or (2) the local governing board
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2005/050053.pdf

^[PDF] Vote requirements to pass ballot measures

Likewise, Proposition 62, approved by the voters in 1986, requires the approval of new local general taxes in many cities by two-thirds of the governing body (as well as a majority of local voters). New Vote Requirements.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2005/050068.pdf

^[PDF] (1) various changes in the state's existing corporation tax (CT), personal income tax (PIT), insurance gross premiums tax, and local property tax, and (2) the imposition of a oil severance tax

The California Constitution specifies that property taxes shall be collected by counties and allocated to local agencies (cities, counties, special districts and K-14 school and community college districts) within the counties.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2005/050085.pdf

^[PDF] "The California Live Within Our Means Act"

Proposal This measure requires that a tax measure be subject to the two-thirds vote requirement if it results in a tax increase for any individual taxpayer—regardless of whether it raises or lowers aggregate taxes.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2005/050110.pdf

2005 Initiative Analysis: Affordable and Safe Prescription Drugs for All Californians Act (version 2)

Potential Savings on State and County Health Program Costs. The pharmacy assistance program established under this initiative could provide some fiscal benefits to the state and to counties by reducing costs for health programs.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2005/050127.htm