^[PDF] MOU Fiscal Analysis: Bargaining Unit 9

Proposed Unit 9 MOU— Other Fiscal Provisions 9L e g i s L a t i v e a n a L y s t ’ s O f f i c e September 4, 2013 LAO 70 YEARS OF SERVICE ; Little Effect on Current-Year Budget, Rising Costs in Future Years.
https://lao.ca.gov/MOU/2013/MOU-BU-9-090413.pdf

^[PDF] MOU Fiscal Analysis: Bargaining Unit 10

Unit 10 is subject to a two-year dependent vesting schedule whereby employees must work for the state for two years before the state pays its full contribution towards dependent health premium costs.
https://lao.ca.gov/MOU/2014/MOU-BU-10-052914.pdf

^[PDF] MOU Fiscal Analysis Bargaining Unit 2

LAO Comments—New Promotional Opportunities Increase State Costs 12L E G I S L A T I V E A N A L Y S T ’ S O F F I C E August 22, 2014 LAO 70 YEARS OF SERVICE  Leave Cash Outs. The administration does not estimate the short-term cost of allowing employees to cash out up to 20 hours of vacation/annual leave each year.
https://lao.ca.gov/MOU/2014/MOU-BU-2-082214.pdf

^[PDF] The 2016-17 Budget: Fiscal Impacts of Proposition 47

Of the $26.9 million in court costs identified by the administration, our analysis finds that $25 million is for workload associated with resentencing hearings that occurred in 2014-15. As noted previously, we believe that a more reasonable way to calculate net savings in a given fiscal year is to account for all costs and savings incurred within that year.
https://lao.ca.gov/Reports/2016/3352/fiscal-impacts-prop47-021216.pdf

^[PDF] 1945-47 Legislative Auditor's Report: Section II

It is significant that miscellaneous expenditures from the General Fund for 1943-44 for State hospitals, prisons, special schools, colleges, and all of the departments and agencies supported by general taxes, amounted to $62,155,000 as compared with an estimated figure of $73,- 337,000 for that year, a saving of $11,182,000.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis/1945/03_section_2_1945-47.pdf

^[PDF] 1945-47 Legislative Auditor's Report: Section III

Following is a tabulation giving estimated tax collections as shown in the Budget for the three fiscal years, 1944"45, 1945-46, and 1946-47, and estimates made by the IJegislative Auditor for the same taxes for these fiscal years. ., ESTDL\TED STAT!
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis/1945/04_section_3_1945-47.pdf

^[PDF] 1947 Budget Analysis: Judicial

This represents an increase of $12,130 or 8.6 percent over expendi- tures of $140,400 for the Fiscal Year 1945-46; and an increase of $5,660 or 3.7 percent over the amount of $146,870 allowed for expenditures in the 1946-47 Fiscal Year.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis/1947/08_judicial_1947.pdf

^[PDF] 1947 Budget Analysis: State Employees' Retirement System

State Employees' Retirement System Analysis of Proposed Expenditures for the 1947-48 Fiscal Year For Support of Board of Administration of the State Employees' Retirement System Item 31, page 4 of the Budget Bill, and page 25 of the Budget.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis/1947/11_retirement_1947.pdf

^[PDF] 1947 Budget Analysis: California Commission on Interstate Cooperation

1947 Budget Analysis: California Commission on Interstate Cooperation -147 - The foregoing decreases in expenditures are partially offset by an increase in administrative expenditures from $96,401 in the 1946-47 Fiscal Year to $107,415 in the 1947-48 Fiscal Year.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis/1947/12_interstate_1947.pdf

^[PDF] 1947 Budget Analysis: Poultry Improvement Oommission

This represents an increase of $124 or 1.3 percent over expenditures of $9,422 for the 1945-46 Fiscal Year; and an increase of $1,799 or 23.2 percent over the amount of $7,747 allowed for expenditure in the 1946-47 Fiscal Year.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis/1947/16_poultry_1947.pdf