^[PDF] Proposition 64 Revenues

.  Cities and counties can require nonmedical cannabis businesses to obtain a local license and set rules for such businesses (such as restricting where they could be located). Cities and counties can also completely ban cannabis-related businesses.
https://lao.ca.gov/handouts/crimjust/2017/Proposition-64-Revenues-021617.pdf

^[PDF] Evaluating the Governor's Realignment Fiscal Superstructure Language

.  Allows a 10 percent transfer between Protective Services and Behavioral Health subaccounts.  Superstructure language also restricts local funding fl exibility in some ways.  Segregated account structure restricts county fl exibility to reallocate 2011 Realignment funds to other program areas outside the subaccount level (with limited exceptions).  Reserve account language
https://lao.ca.gov/handouts/socservices/2012/Evaluating_Realignment_Superstructure_5_25_12.pdf

^[PDF] Highlights of LAO Analysis of the Developmental Services Budget

Currently, 20 cities have minimum wages that exceed the state minimum wage. Although the Legislature has not appropriated funding to explicitly account for resulting service provider staffi ng costs, providers can submit requests for increases on a consumer-by-consumer basis if the consumer’s health or safety is deemed at risk.
https://lao.ca.gov/handouts/socservices/2017/LAO-DDS-Highlights-030117.pdf

^[PDF] Governor's Redevelopment Proposal

The Legislature needs to answer key questions regarding its authority to end redevelop- ment agencies and the ownership of redevelopment assets.  Gain Better Understanding of Redevelopment Finances and Ongoing Obligations.
https://lao.ca.gov/handouts/state_admin/2011/Redevelopment_1_19_11.pdf

^[PDF] Governor's Redevelopment Proposal

The City of Fontana’s redevelopment agency receives about two-thirds of property taxes paid in the city. Redevelopment Background (Continued) 3L E G I S L A T I V E A N A L Y S T ’ S O F F I C E February 7, 2011  No Reliable Evidence That Redevelopment Agencies Improve Overall Economic Development in California.
https://lao.ca.gov/handouts/state_admin/2011/Redevelopment_2_7_11.pdf

^[PDF] Perspectives on the 1987 May Revision

Not all local agencies could accept funding from new state subventions, without approval of their voters, because they already are at their local appropriations limits. • Revenue Transfers. This option involves passage of legislation to reallocate revenues between the state and cities and counties.
https://lao.ca.gov/reports/1987/05_87_perspectives_on_the_1987_may_revision.pdf

^[PDF] Overview of the Governor's December 2010 Special Session Proposals

Eliminate Cash Assistance Program for Immigrants and California Food Assistance Program Recommended achieving part of the proposed savings by making changes prospectively, phasing out benefits gradually, or conditioning benefits on progress toward citi- zenship.
https://lao.ca.gov/reports/2010/bud/special_session/special_session_120710.pdf

^[PDF] Letter to Legislator

 How would the provider payment structure for bridge plans differ from the existing Medi-Cal funding structure that includes such mechanisms as intergovernmental transfers and provider fees?  Would establishing Bridge Plans affect long-term Medi-Cal enrollment and costs by maintaining continuous coverage in Medi-Cal/Bridge Plans?
https://lao.ca.gov/reports/2013/hlth/letters/emmerson-031813.pdf

^[PDF] Letter to Legislator

BUDGETARY EFFECTS OF MOVING DWP Below, we estimate the net additional costs to state government if DWP were transferred to a stand-alone entity and compare those costs to the scenario where DWP is transferred to SWRCB.
https://lao.ca.gov/reports/2013/hlth/letters/perea-053113.pdf

^[PDF] Analysis of Newly Identified Mandates

When a local inmate with TB is released or transferred from a “local detention facility” (local jails) to another jurisdiction, the transferring local detention facility is required to provide notifi cation and a written treatment plan to the LHO in the receiving juris- diction.
https://lao.ca.gov/reports/2013/localgov/Newly-Identified-Mandates-53113.pdf