^[PDF] The McCauley-Rooker Wealth Tax and Oceans Preservation Act (Amendment #1-NS)

Impact From New Taxes One-Time Increase From the Wealth Tax. The measure would result in a one-time increase in state revenues (realized in 2011-12 and 2012-13) as a result of the establish- ment of the wealth tax.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2008/080587.pdf

^[PDF] Microsoft Word - 140436.docx

State general obligation bonds are guaranteed by the state government’s full faith and credit and are generally repaid using the state’s general tax revenues. Local general obligation bonds are typically funded by increased property taxes.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2014/140436.pdf

^[PDF] Cultivation, use, possession, and sale of marijuana

The measure would result in reduced costs to the state and local governments by reducing the number of marijuana offenders incarcerated in state prisons and county jails, as well as the number placed under community supervision (such as county probation).
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2015/150267.pdf

^[PDF] Related to collecting signatures for initiative petitions and proposing laws in the Legislature.

The measure requires the state and county governments to establish an IT system whereby voters may append additional information to their voter registration including their photograph and a scanned image of their thumbprint.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2015/150428.pdf

^[PDF] Death penalty.

County Jails. County jail costs could also be reduced because of the measure’s effect on murder trials. Persons held for trial on murder charges, particularly cases that could result in a death sentence, ordinarily remain in county jail until the completion of their trial and sentencing.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2015/150494.pdf

^[PDF] California campaign finance and disclosure laws. (Amendment #2).

In addition to these one-time costs, state and county governments would experience increased ongoing costs—possibly millions of dollars annually— to administer and enforce the provisions of this measure.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2015/150502.pdf

^[PDF] The cultivation, use, possession, and sale of marijuana (Amendment No 1).

The measure states that no other retail taxes shall be imposed by cities and counties on marijuana sales. Revenues from the local retail excise tax would be allocated to the city or county (if the sale occurs in an unincorporated area) where the marijuana is sold.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2015/150534.pdf

^[PDF] General obligation bonds for water programs and projects. (Amendment No. 1).

Most spending on water programs in the state is done at the local level, such as by water districts, cities, and counties. In recent years, local governments have spent approximately $26 billion per year to supply water and to treat wastewater.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2015/150566.pdf

^[PDF] Tax Expenditures: Policy Issues

Tax Expenditures: Policy Issues Presented to: Commission on the 21st Century Economy February 12, 2009 LAO Tax Expenditures—An Alternative To Direct Spending Programs What is the need for the program?
https://lao.ca.gov/handouts/Econ/2009/Tax_Expenditures_2_12_09.pdf

^[PDF] LAO Analysis of COTCE Revenue Proposals

Calderon, Chair LAO Analysis of COTCE Revenue Proposals L E G I S L A T I V E A N A L Y S T ’ S O F F I C E January 13, 2010 1L E G I S L A T I V E A N A L Y S T ’ S O F F I C E January 13, 2010 Projected State Revenues in 2007 COTCE Tax Proposals (In Billions) Actual Estimated COTCE Difference Personal Income Tax $52.1 $39.1 -$13.0 Sales and Use
https://lao.ca.gov/handouts/Econ/2010/COTCE_01_13_10.pdf