California Tax Policy and the Internet

California Tax Policy and the Internet Combined Maximum Rate 8.75% aMaximum allowable rate except for City and County of San Francisco (1.75 percent) and San Mateo County (2 percent). Sales Taxes Versus Use Taxes The SUT is actually comprised of two separate levies.
https://lao.ca.gov/2000/013100_inet_tax/013100_internet_tax.html

Major Milestones: 43 Years of Care and Treatment of the Mentally Ill

Funding changes were intended to be fiscally neutral and included: new sales and vehicl e license fee taxes and changed state/county cost sharing ratios in health and social service programs. Revenues initially fell short of expectations due to the recession. 1995 Early and Periodic Screening, Diagnosis and Treatment (EPSDT) Increased state matching funds provided to counties in order to comply with the T.L. v.
https://lao.ca.gov/2000/030200_mental_illness/030200_mental_illness.html

Crime Prevention in California: Building Successful Programs

Each county was required to establish a coordinating council that included representatives from county probation, sheriff's office, district attorney's office , social services office, a nonprofit community based organization, and the county office of education.
https://lao.ca.gov/2000/824_crime/082400_crime_prevent.html

2000 Recommended Legislation General Government

Additionally, the Cal-Vet lo an portfolio is declining due to federal restrictions on tax-exempt state bonds (which fund the program) and the aging of the war veteran population. Significant financial and oper ational problems have eroded the state's equity (assets less liabilities) in the Cal-Vet fund by about $200 million.
https://lao.ca.gov/2000/recommended_leg/2000_recommended_leg_gen_gov.html

November 21

One subject about which we currently have unresolved questions involves what the tax status of such bonds will be. It is our present understanding that although such bonds will be tax-exempt at the state level, their tax status at the federal level will depend on the nature of the financing arrangements themselves.
https://lao.ca.gov/2001/sb6x/letter_SB6x_power_authority.htm

^[PDF] Fiscal and Policy Analysis of the California Consumer Power and Conservation Financing Authority

One subject about which we currently have unresolved questions involves what the tax status of such bonds will be. It is our present understanding that although such bonds will be tax-exempt at the state level, their tax status at the federal level will depend on the nature of the financing arrangements themselves.
https://lao.ca.gov/2001/sb6x/letter_SB6x_power_authority.pdf

Get Smart: Reforming the State’s Equipment Financing Program

For example, in the 2002-03 Budget Act , the Legislature approved a $878,000 request by Franchise Tax Broad (FTB) to replace obsolete computer equipment. According to FTB, the request included funding for a GS $Mart loan to purchase the equipment over two years.
https://lao.ca.gov/2003/gs_smart/012903_gs_smart.html

A Review of the California Youth Authority's Infrastructure

In our 2004-05 Budget; Perspectives and Issues (please see page 93), we recommend, as an alternative to the Governor's juvenile justice proposal, that the Legislature consider a reform proposal that would (1) shift responsibility for the relatively small population of youthful offenders in the Youth Authority back to the counties and (2) change the role of the state to that of a "service provider " from whom the counties would buy services.
https://lao.ca.gov/2004/cya/052504_cya.htm

^[PDF] Cal Facts 2006: California's Economy and Budget in Perspective

The average tax rate across the state in 2004-05 was 1.09 percent.  Property tax revenues collected in a county can be distributed only to a local entity within that county.  Until the state's deficit-financing bonds are completely paid off, about one-tenth of the schools' share of prop- erty taxes is redirected to cities and counties.
https://lao.ca.gov/2006/cal_facts/cal_facts_2006.pdf

^[PDF] California Spending Plan 2008-09: The Budget Act and Related Legislation

As shown in Figure 2 (see next page), general purpose funding for school districts, county offices of education (COEs), and community colleges would receive a 0.68 percent COLA. This is notably less than the statutory K-12 COLA rate of 5.66 percent.
https://lao.ca.gov/2008/spend_plan/spending_plan_08-09.pdf