^[PDF] An LAO Reconsidering AB 8: Exploring Alternative Ways to Allocate Property Taxes

An LAO Reconsidering AB 8: Exploring Alternative Ways to Allocate Property Taxes Summary of Alternative IV: Re-Balance Tax Burden Reduce Sales Taxes by 1.25 Percent ($5 Billion) • Reduction split between state (0.75 percent) and local (0.50 percent) rates. • Under current law, state's loss of revenue would be largely offset by re- duced state spending from future vehicle license fee (VLF) reductions not going into effect.
https://lao.ca.gov/2000/020300_ab8/020300_ab8.pdf

California's Fiscal Outlook 2000-01 Through 2005-06 Part 1

These include (1) the diversion of sales taxes for transportation pur poses included in the 2000-01 Budget Act , (2) the certification of the quarter-cent sales tax reduction, and (3) the fiscal effects of targeted tax reductions enacted with this year's budget.
https://lao.ca.gov/2000/fisc_outlook/111500_fiscal_outlook.html

^[PDF] An LAO Overview of the 2001-02 Governor’s Budget

The budget proposal allocates the remaining $8 billion in un- committed resources to finance increased spending ($5.5 billion), cut taxes ($0.1 billion), and provide for a budgetary reserve ($2.4 billion). v Of the total $8 billion the Governor allocates, about 70 percent is for one-time purposes and the remainder is ongoing. v In reviewing the Governor’s proposals in the coming
https://lao.ca.gov/2001/budget_brief/011201_budget_brief.pdf

Fiscal Oulook 2001, Chapter 2

For example, strong growth of the 45 to 64 age group generally benefits tax revenues since this is the age category that routinely earns the highest wages and salaries. Likewise, the growth in the young adult population affects college enrollm ents, while that for the 0-to-4 and 5-to-17 age groups drives K-12 enrollment growth over the forecast period.
https://lao.ca.gov/2001/fisc_outlook/fiscal_outlook_2001_ch2.html

Overview of the 2002-03 Governor's Budget

Tax-Related Proposals The budget proposes that the state conform to the recently enacted federal increases in retirement fund contribution limits. It also would increase, from 80  percent up to the federal requirement of 90  percent, the amount of annual tax liabilities that must be paid in the form of withholding and estimated tax payments.
https://lao.ca.gov/2002/budget_overview/2002-03_bud_overview.html

^[PDF] An Overview of California’s Enterprise Zone Hiring Credit

The data in the figure include all types of EZ incentive tax credits available through a state’s corporation tax, and are not limited to hiring credits only. The number of zones varies widely. For example, Michigan has only one zone while Louisiana has 800.
https://lao.ca.gov/2003/ent_zones/ezones_1203.pdf

^[PDF] Health Care Reform

Consumer Response to Cigarette Tax Increase May Reduce Revenues. Many studies have attempted to calculate what consumers’ reactions will be to an increase in cigarette prices due to a tax change. These studies are based primarily on responses to past tax and price changes.
https://lao.ca.gov/2008/hlth/health_reform/health_reform_012208.pdf

^[PDF] SB840: Single-Payer Health Care System

Figure 2 Estimated New Tax Revenues Resulting From the SPP (In Billions) 2010-11a 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 Employer Wage Tax $28 $58 $61 $64 $67 $70 Employee Wage Tax 14 29 30 32 33 35 Self-Employed Income Tax 3 7 8 8 8 9 Nonwage Income Tax 9 19 20 21 23 24 Totals $53 $113 $119 $125 $132 $139 a Half-year beginning 1/1/11.
https://lao.ca.gov/2008/hlth/sb840/SB840_analysis.pdf

^[PDF] LAO Recommended Legislation 2008

Rationale In November 1988, the voters approved Proposition 99, the To- bacco Tax and Health Protection Act, which established a surtax of 25 cents per pack on cigarette products. The revenues gener- ated by the measure are deposited (by formula) into distinct accounts to support various tobacco education and prevention efforts, tobacco-related disease research, environmental and recreational resource programs, and health care services for uninsured Californians.
https://lao.ca.gov/2008/rec_legislation/rec_leg_120108.pdf

^[PDF] Pending Proposal Concerning Highway Patrol Officer Retiree Health Benefits Funding

Some state retirees—including some hired before 1986, when Medicare taxes became mandatory—are not eligible for Medicare. These re- tirees can remain in CalPERS’ basic health plans. Hire Date and Length of Service Determines if Retiree Receives Maximum Contribu- tion.
https://lao.ca.gov/2009/MOU_Fiscal/CHP_addendum_memo_090209.pdf