^[PDF] California Taxpayer Protection Act of 2010

These savings would be partially offset by increased state and county costs for children who shifted into state- and county-supported Foster Care or into county-run general assistance programs. The provisions changing the processes for applying for public benefits could also reduce state and local costs.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2009/090113.pdf

^[PDF] The McCauley-Rosen Wealth Tax and Oceans Preservation Act

Impact From New Taxes One-Time Increase From the Wealth Tax. The measure would result in a one-time increase in state revenues (realized in 2011-12 and 2012-13) as a result of the establish- ment of the wealth tax.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2009/090486.pdf

^[PDF] California Human Rights Amendment

If those babies and their mothers qualified for and enrolled in state and county health and social services programs these agencies could incur potentially significant increased costs. These potential costs might be offset to the unknown extent that this measure had the effect of reducing the range of birth control methods available to program benefici- aries.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2009/090615.pdf

^[PDF] Parental Notification, Child and Teen Safety, and Stop Predators Act (version 3)

Under these circumstances, there could also be a minor increase in child welfare and foster care costs for the state and counties. Hon. Edmund G. Brown Jr. 6 November 25, 2009 Summary of Fiscal Effects This measure would have the following fiscal effect:  Potential unknown net state costs of several million dollars annually for health and social services programs, court administration, and state health agency administration combined.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2009/090664.pdf

^[PDF] Local Taxpayer, Public Safety, and Transportation Act of 2010 (Version 2) Revised

Other Local Government Revenues Property Tax The Constitution establishes a 1 percent maximum property tax rate on real property and directs counties to collect these tax revenues and allocate them to local govern- ments according to law.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2009/090679.pdf

^[PDF] Taxpayer Protection Act of 2010 (V-2)

Local Taxes. Local governments may impose or increase taxes (other than the base 1 percent ad valorem property tax) subject to the approval of their local voters. If the local government proposes to use the tax proceeds for general purposes (a “general tax”), the tax requires approval by a majority of local voters.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2009/090808.pdf

^[PDF] The Thomas Lomax Taxpayers Protection Act

Current Tax Treatment. Current PIT law allows deductions from income for certain items including local taxes, mortgage interest, charitable donations, and extraordinary medical expenses, but not for general living expenses.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2010/100131.pdf

^[PDF] Article V Convention Initiative

This, in turn, could result in higher or lower federal and state taxes and other revenues. It could also result in more or less federal and state spending on particular public programs. These impacts are impossible to estimate.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2011/110261.pdf

^[PDF] Tax Public Pensions Above $100,000 per Year Act

In addition, hundreds of local governmental entities (including some cities, counties, special districts, and county offices of education) choose to contract with CalPERS to provide pension benefits for their employees.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2011/110519.pdf

^[PDF] Insurance Rate Public Justification and Accountability Act

Insurance Premium and Corporation Tax. Under current law, insurance companies doing business in California generally pay an insurance premium tax instead of the state corporate income tax. The tax is based on the amount of insurance premiums earned in the state each year.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2011/110729.pdf