^[PDF] Financing School Facilities

School districts with considerable property tax wealth could raise large amounts for school facilities by imposing a very low tax rate, while school districts with less property tax wealth would not be able to raise sufficient funds even with a very high tax rate.
https://lao.ca.gov/reports/1986/school_facilities_022086.pdf

^[PDF] Analysis of the 1987-88 Budget Bill: Summary of Recommendations

We further recom- mend the adoption of Item 0860-001-086 to appropriate $1/392/000 from cigarette tax revenues for local government's share of the program cost (Analysis, page 73). 2. Sales Tax Reimbursements The Governor's Budget estimates that in 1987-88 the Board of Equalization will receive $33/510/000 in reimbursements from local governments for the
https://lao.ca.gov/reports/1987/02_87_analysis_of_the_1987-88_budget_bill.pdf

^[PDF] Background Information on the Health Care "Safety Net"

The Tobacco Tax and Health Protection Act of 1988 (Proposi- tion 99) allocates a portion of tobacco tax revenues for county health services. In 1989, the Legislature established the California Healthcare for Indigents Program (CHIP) and the Rural Health Services (RHS) Program, which allocate Proposition 99 funds to expand county indigent health services.
https://lao.ca.gov/reports/1995/backround_information_on_the_health_care_safety_net.pdf

^[PDF] Update California - Trends in K-12 Education Funding

Increases in the largest fund- ing sources-state funds and local property tax levies-account for $9.2 billion of the $11.7 billion increase. There are significant differences in the percentage increase for K-12 Education Funding By Funding Source and Per ADA Current and Constant Dollars 1986-87 Through 1995-96 state funds (29 percent) and for local property tax
https://lao.ca.gov/reports/1995/cal_update_trends_in_k-12_ed_funding.pdf

^[PDF] Highlights of the Analysis and P & I

P & I HIGHLIGHTS > Benefits to Individuals Would Vary Widely • Over two-thirds of benefits would go to personal income taxpayers and the remainder to bank and corporation taxpayers (Perspectives and Issues, page 114). • Low-income individuals will receive no benefits as they currently have no tax liability (Perspectives and Issues, page 116). • High-income individuals will pay
https://lao.ca.gov/reports/1995/highlight_of_the_analysis_pi.pdf

^[PDF] Update California: California's 1994 Crime Rate

State General Fund revenues were up $216 million in July, reflecting higher-than- expected receipts from the sales and use tax (up $188 million) and personal income taxes (up $61 million). The sales tax gain, however, is temporary.
https://lao.ca.gov/reports/1995/update_california_8-1995.pdf

^[PDF] Supplemental Report of the 2010-11 Budget Package

Included in reporting related to items (b), (c), (d), and (e) should be specific data—directly comparable to that included in the applicable budget change proposal (BCP)—for new and expanded activities approved for 2010‑11 concerning sales and use tax collection program enhancement, alcoholic beverage tax audit programs, participation in the High Intensity
https://lao.ca.gov/reports/2010/supp_report/supp_report_2010.pdf

^[PDF] The 2014-15 Budget: California's Fiscal Outlook

The Legislature has authorized several similar taxes on MCOs since 2010, but all prior taxes were at the state’s 2.35 percent gross premiums insurance tax rate rather than the 3.9 percent state General Fund sales tax rate.
https://lao.ca.gov/reports/2013/bud/fiscal-outlook/fiscal-outlook-112013.pdf

^[PDF] The 2015-16 Budget: California Spending Plan

Th e Legislature did not adopt the Governor’s MCO tax proposal as part of the 2015-16 budget package enacted in June. However, because the current MCO tax does not expire until the end of June 2016, and the federal deadline to bring the tax into compliance is August 2016, failure to modify the tax does not aff ect the Medi-Cal budget in 2015-16.
https://lao.ca.gov/reports/2015/3302/2015-16-spending-plan.pdf

^[PDF] The 2016-17 Budget: Analysis of the Medi-Cal Budget

Further, awareness of these cost pressures may inform other policy decisions the Legislature is considering, including whether to pass a restructured MCO tax. Hospital QAF Sunset Background. Federal Medicaid regulations allow states to assess “health care-related taxes” on certain health care providers and use the tax revenues as the nonfederal share of Medicaid payments.
https://lao.ca.gov/reports/2016/3350/medi-cal-budget-analysis-021116.pdf