^[PDF] 1950 Budget Analysis: CAPITAL OUTLAY

There has been no showing on the part of the agency that sizeable inaccuracies resulted from any method of _ pro rating for these charges, and in the final analysis the amount of the reimbursements is actually a transfer between funds by the State.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis/1950/37_capital_outlay_1950.pdf

^[PDF] June 15, 1999 1999-00 Budget Bill Conference Committee Version

June 15, 1999 1999-00 Budget Bill Conference Committee Version Starting balance, July 1, 1999 $2,361 $2,539 $178 Revenues and transfers 62,985 63,230 245 Total resources available $65,346 $65,769 $423 Expenditures $63,223 $64,052 $829 Ending fund balance, June 30, 2000 $2,123 $1,717 -$406 Other obligations $480 $480 — Set-asides 658 — -$658 Reserve $985 $1,237 $252 Detail may not total due to rounding. • Reserve.
https://lao.ca.gov/1999/99-00_conference_committee_floor_packet.pdf

^[PDF] The Distribution of K-12 Education General Purpose Funds

Data from 2002-03 indicate that Capistrano gains about $65,000 in higher revenue limit payments for the 150 students transferring from Fallbrook. This amounts to about $1.35 per ADA in the district. Fallbrook, by keeping the property tax share of these students, receives about $425,000 in extra funds, or about $75 per ADA in the district.
https://lao.ca.gov/2003/k12_fund_distribution/K12_General_Purpose_Funds_122203.pdf

^[PDF] 1966 Budget Analysis: Veterans Affairs

Most of the releases recorded are actually transfer of members within the home to benefit from the appropriate level of care. The 695 releases from the hospital in 1965 included 48 to the outside, 181 deceased and 466 (67 percent) to the annexes or barracks.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis/1966/17_veterans_1966.pdf

^[PDF] Preschool for All Act

Transfers into and maintenance of operations and facilities reserve funds. The SPI would determine a uniform statewide per-pupil rate for distribution of funds to COEs. In the early years of implementation, funds would be distributed based on the number of four-year-olds in each county.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2005/050658.pdf

2005 Initiative Analysis: The Clean Alternative Energy Act (version 1), Amendment #2-S

These revenues would not be subject to the sta te appropriations limit, would not be eligible for loan or transfer to the state’s General Fund, and would be continuously appropriated (and thus, not subject to the annual state budget appropriation process).
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2005/050987.htm

2005 Initiative Analysis: The Clean Alternative Energy Act (version 2), Amendment #2-S

These revenues would not be subject to the sta te appropriations limit, would not be eligible for loan or transfer to the state’s General Fund, and would be continuously appropriated (and thus, not subject to the annual state budget appropriation process).
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2005/050988.htm

^[PDF] The Clean Alternative Energy Act (version 2), Amendment #2-S

These revenues would not be subject to the state appropriations limit, would not be eligible for loan or transfer to the state’s General Fund, and would be continuously appropriated (and thus, not subject to the annual state budget appropriation process).
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2005/050988.pdf

^[PDF] May Revision Changes to Proposition 98

The administration suggests that these funds be targeted at low performing schools for K-12, and nursing, career technical education and improving transfer rates for community colleges. Increase to Ongoing Base Funding Level.
https://lao.ca.gov/handouts/education/2006/MR_051606.pdf

^[PDF] Overview of the 2006-07 May Revision

At the time the 2006‑07 Governor’s Budget was released in January, the U.S. and California economies had experienced a year of solid economic growth, although there were signs of softness in the Figure 1 How May Revision Allocates $7.5 Billion in Additional Revenues Since January (In Billions) New Resources Revenue increase relative to January: 2005-06 $4.8 2006-07 2.7 Total, New Resources
https://lao.ca.gov/2006/may_revise/may_revise_051506.pdf