2002 Budget Analysis: Health and Social Services, Department of Social Services CalWORKs Program (5180)

Because the Governor proposes to freeze budget-year allocations, this underfunding would persist in 2002-03. Funding pressures within CalWORKs are likely to intensify in future years, for several reasons.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_2002/health_ss/healthss_15_calWORKs_anl02.htm

2002 Budget Analysis: Health and Social Services, Foster Care

For example, "children are safe; " "children are living in stable living situations; " and "children are succeeding in school " are outcomes. An outcome measure , or indicator helps quantify the degree to which a desired outcome has been reached.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_2002/health_ss/healthss_17_Foster_care_anl02.htm

2002 Budget Analysis: Health and Social Services, Food Stamps Program

Assuming the Bush administration's proposal bec omes law effective October 1, 2002 (the start of the new FFY), the resulting net General Fund savings would be approximately $25 million in 2002-03 ($10 million below the savings a ssumed in the Governor's budget).
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_2002/health_ss/healthss_18_food_stamps_anl02.htm

2002 Budget Analysis: Health and Social Services, Supplemental Security Income/State Supplementary Program

This is an increase of $228  million, or 8.1  percent, over estimated current-year expenditures. This increase is due primarily to the full-year cost of grant increases provided in the current year, caseload growth, and an in crease in the federal administrative fee.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_2002/health_ss/healthss_19_ssi_ssp_anl02.htm

2002 Budget Analysis: Resources, Department of Water Resources (3860)

The budget proposes about $9.4  million from the General Fund to implement the drought panel's recommendations in the budget year. This is a decrease of $1.1  million from the current year, mainly reflecting the elimination of a one-time expenditure.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_2002/resources/res_10_3860_anl02.htm

2002 Budget Analysis: Resources, Department of Pesticide Regulation (3930)

For the current year, the state provided $13.3  million and the budget proposes the same amount for 2002-03. While counties conduct about 40,000 pesticide use inspections a year using these funds, DPR's compliance assessment suggests that these inspections have not been effective in ensuring acceptable levels of compliance in several counties in the department's study.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_2002/resources/res_12_3930_anl02.htm

2002 Budget Analysis: Resources, State Water Resources Control Board (3940)

For 2002-03, the budget proposes $68.3  million for the board's core regulatory program, a slight decrease from estimated expenditures in the current year. However, the budget proposes a significantly different mix of funding sources than in the current year.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_2002/resources/res_13_3940_anl02.htm

2002 Budget Analysis: Resources, Department of Toxic Substances Control (3960)

According to the authority, the CPCFA has a fund balance of approximately $55  million in the current year. Of this amount, CPCFA has set aside $10  million for the brownfield program and $2.5  million for another economic development program.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_2002/resources/res_14_3960_anl02.htm

2002 Budget Analysis: Resources, Overview

Figure  2 also shows that compared to current-year expenditures, the budget proposes a reduction throughout the resources departments. Specifically, the budget proposes a substantial redu ction in DPR expenditures of about $1.1  billion, or 74  percent less than the current-year estimated expenditure level.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_2002/resources/res_1_overview_anl02.htm

2002 Budget Analysis: Resources, Fund Conditions for Resources Programs

The costs of these projects are currently shared by the federal government (50 percent to 75  percent), state government (12.5 percent to 35  percent), and local government (7.5 percent to 25  percent).
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_2002/resources/res_3_resources_funds_anl02.htm