^[PDF] California Prison Population Reduction Act of 2008

Court-Related Activities and County Jails. This measure would result in additional state and local costs for the courts and county jails. Two factors primarily account for the increased costs. The first factor is the resentencing provision of this measure, which would increase court caseloads and increase county jail costs because jails would house inmates during the resentencing proceedings.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2007/070678.pdf

^[PDF] Overview of Governor’s Child Care and Preschool Proposals

Department of Social Services (DSS) would oversee all subsidized child care funding and services.  Makes a Number of Refi nements to 2013-14 Proposal  Specifi es that child care funding for former and non- CalWORKs participants would be maintained in a separate county-level block grant, not part of counties’ single funding allocation for CalWORKs services. 
https://lao.ca.gov/handouts/education/2012/Overview_of_Governors_Child_Care_and_Preschool_Proposals_052312.pdf

^[PDF] An LAO Special Education Facilities Funding Report

This will stream- line the funding process, maximize local flexibility to provide fa- cilities needed to serve all their pupils, and minimize state and local administrative costs. v Establish a separate facility grant for county offices of education in recognition of the special education pupils served at county facilities. v Require county offices of education to provide local matching funds except in financial hardship cases.
https://lao.ca.gov/2000/010399_special_ed_facilities/010399_special_ed_facilities.pdf

^[PDF] 1948 Budget Analysis: DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL WElFARE

Under the Social Security Act, if the counties do not comply with fed- eral regulations relating to merit systems, the Federal Government cuts off all funds allocated to the State of California. For this reason the ., Department of Social Welfare is forced to take all necessary steps to see that county merit systems abide by the federal regulations.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis/1948/25_social_welfare_1948.pdf

^[PDF] The 2018-19 Budget: Governor’s Criminal Justice Proposals

Counties are generally responsible for the juvenile court youths, some of whom are placed in county juvenile facilities . If the judge finds that the youth committed certain significant crimes listed in statute (such as murder, robbery, and certain sex offenses), the judge can place the youth in state juvenile facilities operated by DJJ .
https://lao.ca.gov/reports/2018/3762/2018-19-crim-justice-proposals-022818.pdf

Restoring Coho Salmon In California

In October 1996, NMFS listed as threatened coho that return to st reams in central California, from southern Humboldt County to Santa Cruz County. The two actions combined affect almost all areas in the state where the coho exists.
https://lao.ca.gov/1997/101497_coho_salmon/101497_coho_salmon.html

^[PDF] Appendix 3, Figure 1 Cash Financing Capital Outlay Discretionary

Appendix 3, Figure 1 Cash Financing Capital Outlay Discretionary Proposals in the 2023–24 May Revision General Fund (In Millions) Department/ Program Description Governor’s Budget May Revision 2022–23 2023–24 2022–23 2023–24 DGS New Richards Boulevard project — $402 — $402 Judicial Branch Shasta County—New Redding Courthouse — 54 — 54 Judicial Branch Imperial
https://lao.ca.gov/reports/2023/4769/Appendix-3-New-Discretionary-Spending.pdf

The 2012-13 Budget: Oversight and Accountability at State Hospitals

IST Treatment in County Jail. The Governor ’s budget includes a decrease of $3 million General Fund resulting from treating defendants found to be IST in county jails, rather than state hospitals, when medically appropriate.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis/2012/health/oversight-accountability-state-hospitals-030112.aspx

2009 Initiative Analysis: Human Trafficking (Amendment #1-S)

This is because state and county governments would be responsible for supervising additional offenders subject to these provisions. However, given that, as of December 2009, only six individuals were reportedly being held in state prison for human trafficking, any increase in costs resulting from this measure is likely to be minimal compared to the overall cost of the state and county correctional systems.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2009/090763.aspx

2009 Initiative Analysis: Human Trafficking (version 2)

This is because state and county governments would be responsible for supervising additional offenders subject to these provisions. However, given that, as of December 2009, only six individuals were reportedly being held in state prison for human trafficking, any increase in costs resulting from this measure is likely to be minimal compared to the overall cost of the state and county correctional systems.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2009/090850.aspx