2002 Budget Analysis: Resources, Department of Water Resources (3860)

The budget proposes about $9.4  million from the General Fund to implement the drought panel's recommendations in the budget year. This is a decrease of $1.1  million from the current year, mainly reflecting the elimination of a one-time expenditure.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_2002/resources/res_10_3860_anl02.htm

2002 Budget Analysis: Resources, Department of Pesticide Regulation (3930)

For the current year, the state provided $13.3  million and the budget proposes the same amount for 2002-03. While counties conduct about 40,000 pesticide use inspections a year using these funds, DPR's compliance assessment suggests that these inspections have not been effective in ensuring acceptable levels of compliance in several counties in the department's study.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_2002/resources/res_12_3930_anl02.htm

2002 Budget Analysis: Resources, State Water Resources Control Board (3940)

For 2002-03, the budget proposes $68.3  million for the board's core regulatory program, a slight decrease from estimated expenditures in the current year. However, the budget proposes a significantly different mix of funding sources than in the current year.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_2002/resources/res_13_3940_anl02.htm

2002 Budget Analysis: Resources, Department of Toxic Substances Control (3960)

According to the authority, the CPCFA has a fund balance of approximately $55  million in the current year. Of this amount, CPCFA has set aside $10  million for the brownfield program and $2.5  million for another economic development program.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_2002/resources/res_14_3960_anl02.htm

2002 Budget Analysis: Resources, Overview

Figure  2 also shows that compared to current-year expenditures, the budget proposes a reduction throughout the resources departments. Specifically, the budget proposes a substantial redu ction in DPR expenditures of about $1.1  billion, or 74  percent less than the current-year estimated expenditure level.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_2002/resources/res_1_overview_anl02.htm

2002 Budget Analysis: Resources, Fund Conditions for Resources Programs

The costs of these projects are currently shared by the federal government (50 percent to 75  percent), state government (12.5 percent to 35  percent), and local government (7.5 percent to 25  percent).
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_2002/resources/res_3_resources_funds_anl02.htm

2002 Budget Analysis: Resources, Department of Fish and Game (3600)

Prior to 2000-01, the department's CEQA review efforts constituted the equivalent of nine personnel-years and about $767,000. In response to findings that the department's activi ties related to CEQA were not being conducted at an adequate level, the Legislature augmented DFG's budget for CEQA review in 2000-01 by $2.1  million (ongoing) from the General Fund and redirected 25 positions to CEQA review efforts.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_2002/resources/res_8_3600_anl02.htm

2002 Budget Analysis: Transportation, Overview

2002 Budget Analysis: Transportation, Overview Overview Total state-funded expenditures for transportation programs are proposed to be substantially higher, by 9.4  percent, in 2002-03 than estimated current-year expenditures.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_2002/transportation/trans_01_ov_anl02.htm

^[PDF] Highlights of the 2003-04 Analysis and P&I

(Analysis, page E-25.) ! State and Federal Accountability Programs " We recommend that the Legislature take steps to integrate state and federal sanction and intervention programs to send a clear message of expectations to schools and districts.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_2003/03-04_budget_highlights.pdf

2003 Budget Analysis: P&I, Part 1

This was evident, for example, in its response to the ad ministration's mid-year proposals, where the Legislature made significant changes. Similarly, the Legislature is likely to disagree with many spending reduction proposals in the Governor's budget-year plan.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_2003/2003_pandi/pi_part_5c_options_anl03.html