^[PDF] Overview of the 1995-96 May Revision

As shown in Figure 3: • Sales and use taxes are down $407 million. • Remaining revenues are up $343 million, including bank and corporation taxes (up $295 million). Reasonableness of the Revenue Forecast.
https://lao.ca.gov/reports/1995/overview_of_the_1995-96_may_revision.pdf

^[PDF] Update California: Economic and Budget Developments

Tax receipts closely related to current eco- nomic activity-in particular personal income tax withholding and corporation tax prepay- ments-are up significantly in 1995 from the prior year, suggesting that employment, wages, and profits are continuing to expand in this state.
https://lao.ca.gov/reports/1995/update_california_7-1995.pdf

^[PDF] State's Fiscal Outlook Brightens

In addition, there were moderate gains in sales and use taxes and in corporate income taxes. Qom;.ed w-:: the cumulative gain in revenues o 30smlnion relative to the budget estimate that wJk; experienced tb,ro11gh Mar.ch, the April gain for the major taxes brou~t cumulative 1996-97 revenues to about'® mjll jo(iabove the January bud- get estimate.
https://lao.ca.gov/reports/1997/update_california_5-1997.pdf

2005-06 Overview of the Governor's Budget

In order to achieve savings, the budget proposes to (1)  shift funding for county juvenile probation programs from the General Fund to federal TANF funds ($201  million), (2)  reduce funding for local juvenile crime prevention programs ($75  million), (3)  eliminate grant funding for sheriffs in small and rural counties ($18.5  million), and (4)  reduce CDC's spending by $95  million.
https://lao.ca.gov/2005/budget_overview/2005-06_budget_overview.htm

^[PDF] 2006-07 Overview of the Governor's Budget

These include primarily private investments in transportation facilities and future transportation bonds that would be backed by state gas tax and weight fee revenues and future federal transportation funds.
https://lao.ca.gov/2006/budget_ov/2006-07_budget_ov.pdf

^[PDF] California Budget Responsibility Act

Vote Requirement to Increase Taxes Unchanged. The measure does not change the vote requirement for bills increasing taxes, which would still require a two-thirds vote of each house. Fiscal Effect State Spending.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2008/080871.pdf

^[PDF] California Marriage Equality Act (Amendment #1-S)

Particularly in the near term, this could increase revenues to state and local governments (primarily sales tax revenues). Over the longer run, however, this measure would likely have little fiscal impact on state and local governments.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2009/090025.pdf

^[PDF] Vote SAFE: Secure and Fair Elections Act

Fiscal Effect Counties determine how many precincts and poll workers to use at each election based on the number of expected voters and the time it takes for each voter to cast a bal- lot. This measure would have various fiscal impacts on government (primarily coun- ties).
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2009/090114.pdf

^[PDF] The McCauley Pension Recovery Act

While the proposed excise tax is not technically a tax on current income, the outcome is similar (especially since this measure allows the excise tax to be paid over time). As a result, the excise tax may not survive a legal chal- lenge.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2009/090203.pdf

^[PDF] Vote SAFE: Secure and Fair Elections Act (version 2) (Amendment #1-S)

Fiscal Effect Counties determine how many precincts and poll workers to use at each election based on the number of expected voters and the time it takes for each voter to cast a bal- lot. This measure would have various fiscal impacts on government (primarily coun- ties).
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2009/090257.pdf